Policy S4: Meeting Housing Needs

Object

Representation ID: 3009

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Castle Properties

Agent: Neame Sutton Limited

Object - plan should seek to meet need 724dpa

The method used for calculating unmet need from SDNP is not the standard one - is unreliable. The unmet need from the NP is 44dpa unclear why CDC only proposing to meet 41 dpa.

Object

Representation ID: 3013

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Sunley Estates Ltd

Agent: Neame Sutton Limited

Object - CDC should meet higher need 724dpa

Concerns over SDNPA unmet need calculation.

CDC not meeting all of NP unmet need

Comment

Representation ID: 3021

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Thakeham Homes

Give further consideration to unmet needs of neighbouring authorities/HMA

Need housing trajectories

Include buffer of 20%

Allocate range of sites to ensure provision comes forward evenly.

Comment

Representation ID: 3026

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: William Lacey Group

Agent: Strutt and Parker LLP

Support approach to meet Chichester's identified needs plus need from SDNP.

Need to provide evidence of joint working with neighbouring authorities to establish whether unmet need elsewhere can be met.

Object

Representation ID: 3036

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Rydon Homes Ltd

Agent: Sigma Planning Services

Plan does not reflect identified needs plus unmet need of the NP. Housing figure should not be capped as the current plan does not meet OAN.

Rydon undertaken only SA to assess impact of 800 dpa and consider that the Council's SA is flawed.

Plan should seek to meet full OAN of 775dpa

Comment

Representation ID: 3050

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Arun District Council

CDC should consider whether can meet unmet need within wider West Sussex and Greater Brighton Area.

Consider scope for introducing policy trigger mechanisms

Make supporting evidence clearer on capacity to deliver higher housing numbers

Make supporting evidence clearer on imbalance between households/jobs

Update SOCG between Chichester and Arun

Comment

Representation ID: 3139

Received: 07/03/2019

Respondent: Obsidian Strategic SB Limited

Agent: PRP Architects Ltd

At present the plan is compliant with the NPPF as the housing target exceeds the standard method target

Object

Representation ID: 3222

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Elberry Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

OAN has potential flaws as cap on previous requirement already failed to meet need.

Significant reliance on large sites - need a housing trajectory.

Comment

Representation ID: 3238

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Agent: Henry Adams LLP

Council should plan for greater figure than 12,350.

Object to use of HEDNA as opposed to standard methodology.

No allowance for unmet need in wider HMA

Comment

Representation ID: 3243

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: WSCC (Estates)

Agent: Henry Adams LLP

Council should plan for higher figure.

No justification for use of HEDNA figure as opposed to standard method.

No consideration of meeting unmet need from HMA.

Object

Representation ID: 3272

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Landacre Developments Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Whilst we understand the need assessment was carried out in accordance with standard method set out in PPG we suggest it has potential flaws as 435dpa in adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just National Park.

Out of the total 12,350 dwellings, 4,400 or 35% are proposed as new strategic allocations. Given this significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead in times for housing delivery we suggest the plan includes a trajectory for them especially as this would better comply with Paragraph 73 of the NPPF2.

Object

Representation ID: 3289

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Grain Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Whilst we understand the need assessment was carried out in accordance with standard method set out in PPG we suggest it has potential flaws as 435dpa in adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just National Park.

Out of the total 12,350 dwellings, 4,400 or 35% are proposed as new strategic allocations. Given this significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead in times for housing delivery we suggest the plan includes a trajectory for them especially as this would better comply with Paragraph 73 of the NPPF2.

Object

Representation ID: 3301

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Barratt Homes

Agent: Luken Beck MDP Ltd

Cap on adopted LP target resulted in artificial low housing figure as the adopted LP is not meeting full OAN.

Stepped trajectory is unrealistic

Object

Representation ID: 3313

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Domusea

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Whilst we understand the need assessment was carried out in accordance with standard method set out in PPG we suggest it has potential flaws as 435dpa in adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just National Park.

Out of the total 12,350 dwellings, 4,400 or 35% are proposed as new strategic allocations. Given this significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead in times for housing delivery we suggest the plan includes a trajectory for them especially as this would better comply with Paragraph 73 of the NPPF2.

Comment

Representation ID: 3317

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Landlinx Estates Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Whilst we understand the need assessment has been carried out in accordance with the standard method set out in PPG Suggest need assessment has potential flaws as the 435dpa in adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should also consider un-met needs of other adjoining authorities.

Significant reliance on large sites and the potential longer lead in times for housing delivery.
Welcome windfall small sites allowance and Parish sites allowance.

Object

Representation ID: 3326

Received: 04/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Luken Beck MDP Ltd

Use of standard method without sufficient adjustment to meet needs of adjoining authorities increases risk of failing to meet full local housing need.

Housing need is greater than that set out in standard methodology.

Object

Representation ID: 3332

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Samuel Langmead

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Need assessment has potential flaws as the 435dpa in the adopted plan already
fails to meet need. It should also consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just the National Park.

Given significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead in times for housing delivery, suggest plan includes a trajectory for them.

Welcome windfall small sites allowance and Parish sites allowance.

Object

Representation ID: 3338

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Mr and Mrs R Ellis

Number of people: 2

Agent: Genesis Town Planning Ltd

Need assessment has potential flaws as the 435dpa in the adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should also consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just the National Park.

Significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead in times for housing delivery - suggest plan includes a trajectory for them.

Object

Representation ID: 3354

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Object to S4 - does not meet need, no flexibility and lacks clarity.

Should be 775dpa.

questions over deliverability of strategic allocations through NPs.

Clarity is required to establish whether the Council is double-counting.

No housing trajectory provided

Object

Representation ID: 3361

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Junnell Homes Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Whilst we understand the need assessment was carried out in accordance with standard method set out in PPG we suggest it has potential flaws as 435dpa in adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just National Park.

Out of the total 12,350 dwellings, 4,400 or 35% are proposed as new strategic allocations. Given this significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead in times for housing delivery we suggest the plan includes a trajectory for them especially as this would better comply with Paragraph 73 of the NPPF2.

Object

Representation ID: 3371

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Jeff Ferguson

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Need assessment has potential flaws as the 435dpa in the adopted plan already fails to meet need. Should also consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just the National Park.

As significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead-in times for housing delivery, suggest the plan includes a trajectory.

Welcome windfall small sites allowance and parish sites.

Propose definition of windfall sites in the Local Plan glossary is clarified so that it meets the 'consistent with national policy' test of soundness.

Object

Representation ID: 3385

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Ms Rebecca Newman

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Need assessment has potential flaws as the 435dpa in the adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should also consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just the National Park.

Welcome both windfall small sites allowance and Parish sites allowance.

Object

Representation ID: 3392

Received: 04/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Luken Beck MDP Ltd

Consider the approach to meeting the District's local housing need and the development strategy is 'unsound'. The application of the Standard Method without sufficient adjustment to meet some of the needs of the adjoining authorities or the specific social and economic circumstances of the District increases the risk of failing to meet the full local housing need. The policy is therefore not considered to be positively prepared or consistent with national policy.

Object

Representation ID: 3396

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Luken Beck MDP Ltd

The application of the Standard Method without sufficient adjustment to meet some of the needs of the adjoining authorities or the specific social and economic circumstances of the District increases the risk of failing to meet the full local housing need. The policy is therefore not considered to be positively prepared or consistent with national policy

Object

Representation ID: 3403

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Luken Beck MDP Ltd

The proposed policy wording is not positively prepared, consistent with national policy nor will it be effective in delivering the District's full local housing need in sustainable locations, such as the Settlement Hubs and Service Villages.

Object

Representation ID: 3409

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Out of the total 12,350 dwellings, 4,400 or 35% are proposed as new strategic allocations. Given this significant reliance on large sites and the potential longer lead in times for housing delivery we therefore suggest the plan includes a trajectory for them especially as this would better comply with Paragraph 73 of the NPPF2.

Comment

Representation ID: 3410

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Greenwood Group Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Need assessment has potential flaws as the 435dpa in the adopted plan already
fails to meet need. Should also consider un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just the National Park.

Given significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead in times for housing delivery, suggest plan includes a trajectory.

Welcome both windfall small sites allowance and Parish sites allowance.

Object

Representation ID: 3416

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Meadows Partnership

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

The Assessment confirms OAN is capped at 40% above the adopted housing requirement. The Local Plan was adopted on the basis of approximately 435 dpa. Capping the OAN to 40% above the adopted figure gives Chichester a housing need of 609 dpa.
Whilst we understand the need assessment has been carried out in accordance with the standard method set out in PPG we suggest it has potential flaws as the 435dpa in the adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should also consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just the National Park.

Object

Representation ID: 3424

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Promoting land at Burnes Shipyard
Refers to windfall small sites allowance. We propose a settlement policy boundary amendment to Bosham to include land at Burnes
Shipyard.

We therefore propose the definition of windfall sites in the Local Plan glossary is clarified to make clear that they comprise previously developed sites that have unexpectedly become available within settlements and in rural areas outside a settlement boundary. This clarification would benefit the Local Plan in better meeting the 'consistent with national policy' test of soundness.

Object

Representation ID: 3495

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Sue and Geoff Talbot

Number of people: 2

Object on grounds that 40% of new housing proposed is allocated to east-west corridor without sufficient comprehensive planning guidance.