Policy S5: Parish Housing Requirements 2016-2035

Comment

Representation ID: 3265

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: WSCC (Estates)

Agent: Henry Adams LLP

Land available at West Wittering for housing development (Land at Ellanore Lane) for approx. 25 dwellings.

Greater number of new homes can be provided within service villages

Object

Representation ID: 3269

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Loxwood Parish Council

Object to Loxwood allocation:
- unequal distribution of housing
- inadequate process for determining housing figure
- assumption of sustainability
- school capacity
- lack of public transport
- flooding
- lack of employment
- sewage
- environmental impact

Object

Representation ID: 3273

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Landacre Developments Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Parish housing allocations comprise 500 dwellings distributed amongst the settlements in accordance with their ranking in the settlement hierarchy.


Concerned that Fishbourne given a nil allocation in S5 and 250 dwelling allocation has been included in policy AL9 as a parish strategic allocation. We believe that as Fishbourne parish is preparing its own Neighbourhood Plan, it should be given flexibility to choose how it allocates sites. A nil allocation in S5 could be interpreted to mean all 250 houses have to be found on 1 single site rather than on several smaller sites as part of a dispersed strategy.

Support

Representation ID: 3280

Received: 29/01/2019

Respondent: Westbourne Parish Council

Support 0 housing requirement for Westbourne.

Object

Representation ID: 3314

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: West Sussex County Council

Agent: Savills Plc

50 units for Chichester is very low and does not encourage development of appropriate PDL. Land is available at the Tannery site, Westgate to accommodate 30 units - it is a strategic site for Chichester

Object

Representation ID: 3318

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Domusea

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Promoting site at Pigeon House Farm, North Mundham with access from B2166 Lagness Road which has capacity for 125 dwellings.

Unequal distribution of housing between Hunston and North Mundham/Runcton.

Object

Representation ID: 3319

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Landlinx Estates Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Allocation of 125 dwellings to Loxwood far outweighs other settlements in the NE part of district.

1.9ha of land with a capacity of around 33 dwellings is available on land at Loxwood House Guildford Road. This site is located adjacent to the Loxwood Nursery Neighbourhood Plan allocation under construction for 43 dwellings. Land at Loxwood House is not constrained by any access, infrastructure, biodiversity or landownership constraint.

Support

Representation ID: 3333

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Samuel Langmead

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Support allocation of 125 dwellings to Birdham.

2.1ha of land with a capacity of around 25 dwellings is available at Church Road Birdham. Believe 25 units within the AONB with the remaining 100 outside the AONB represents a reasonable distribution.

Object

Representation ID: 3339

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Mr and Mrs R Ellis

Number of people: 2

Agent: Genesis Town Planning Ltd

North Mundham has been allocated a figure of 50 dwellings, Contend that proposed settlement boundary extension to the north of the settlement off School Lane, north of the B2166 is discordant and remote from the settlement and would not be an appropriate extension of the settlement. Also inconsistent in its relationship with the settlement as a whole and extends excessively north.

Object

Representation ID: 3356

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Policy misleading as to extent of allocations being passed to NPs and no justification for difference in housing figures being attributed to different parishes.

Title misleading as implies that parishes with strategic allocations have a 0 number to meet.

Object

Representation ID: 3363

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Junnell Homes Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Promoting site on land east of The Spinney, 0.23ha of land with a capacity of around 8 - 9 dwellings
Unequal distribution of housing.

Comment

Representation ID: 3376

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Jeff Ferguson

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Concerned that proposed distribution for West Wittering is not in accordance with ranking in settlement hierarchy. Allocation of 25 units under represents service village ranking in Hierarchy background paper of 6th largest of all settlements Suggest West Wittering take a greater share of housing than is currently proposed. A figure of 50-100 dwellings would be appropriate.

Plan attached shows land at Bramber Nursery West Wittering. This is a previously developed site and could come forward as a windfall opportunity or as an allocated site in emerging West Wittering Neighbourhood Plan.

Object

Representation ID: 3381

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Tearall

Number of people: 2

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Object to nil allocation for the parish in policy S5; implies all new housing has to be found on new strategic sites within the parish; overlooks potential capacity for unidentified sites to come forward.

Central part of Broad Road offers opportunity for further windfall sites to come forward; settlement policy boundary amendment to include area would facilitate this. Attached plan shows vacant plot south of Yeoman's Field to be suitable for housing. If included within new settlement policy boundary, could count against 'windfall allowance' or towards parish allowance.

Object

Representation ID: 3386

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Ms Rebecca Newman

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Paragraph 4.26 of the Plan says housing allocations have been distributed amongst the settlements in accordance with their ranking in the settlement hierarchy. Concerned that proposed distribution for Hunston and North Mundham/Runcton does not do this as Hunston has 9 facilities compared with 8 at North Mundham/ Runcton. Hunston is however, allocated 200 units as a strategic allocation and North Mundham has only 50 as a parish housing allocation.

Object

Representation ID: 3411

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

We are concerned that Fishbourne has been given a nil allocation in S5 and instead the total 250 dwelling allocation has been included in policy AL9 as a parish strategic allocation. We believe that as Fishbourne parish is preparing its own Neighbourhood Plan, it should be given the flexibility to choose how it allocates sites for development. In our view, a nil allocation in S5 could be interpreted to mean all 250 houses have to be found on 1 single site rather than on several smaller sites as part of a dispersed strategy.

Object

Representation ID: 3412

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Greenwood Group Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

S5 should allocate some housing on parish sites to Sidlesham in the order of 25-50 dwellings as this has been deemed suitable for the other service villages in S5.

Land is available at Greenwood Nursery Highleigh Road Sidlesham for around 35 dwellings. Site is outside the designated horticultural development area, within flood zone 1 (least liable to flood) and has no biodiversity or heritage interest. It is located outside the Chichester Harbour Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. It has a footpath link to the nearby school.

Object

Representation ID: 3418

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Meadows Partnership

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Parish housing allocations comprise 500 dwellings and they have been distributed in accordance with their ranking in the settlement hierarchy.

We are concerned that the proposed distribution does not do this for West Wittering. For instance it is only allocated 25 units which under represents its service village ranking in the Hierarchy background paper of 6th largest of all settlements in terms of population with 16 facilities, second only to Bosham and Broadbridge with 21. We suggest that West Wittering should therefore take a greater share of housing than is currently proposed. A figure of 50-100 dwellings would be appropriate.

Object

Representation ID: 3425

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

At present the entire 250 housing allocation for Bosham parish is set out in policy AL7 as a strategic allocation to come forward at Highgrove Farm. There is a nil allocation for the parish in policy S5.

We Object as it implies all new housing has to be found on new large strategic sites within the parish and overlooks the potential capacity for unidentified sites to come forward within and adjoining the existing built up area due to modest settlement policy boundary adjustments.
Disagree that any site within the AONB of Bosham should be ruled out for development in principle.

Object

Representation ID: 3457

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: A + D Lygo-Baker

Number of people: 2

Proposals for this Local Plan:
- no initial funding for Stockbridge Link Road
- no provision for walkers or cyclists
- impact on roads
- impact on schools

Object

Representation ID: 3552

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Berkeley Strategic Land Ltd.

Agent: WYG

Lavant should have a housing number.

The Lavant Neighbourhood Plan also underrepresents the actual housing need and has not planned suitably for the required growth and around 206 dwellings should be delivered in Lavant over the Plan period.