Policy AL13: Southbourne Parish

Comment

Representation ID: 3286

Received: 29/01/2019

Respondent: Westbourne Parish Council

AL13 poses significant threat to Westbourne.

Suggest policy includes mitigation against road traffic by ensuring a road bridge is built over railway in Southbourne. Devt north of railway will be opposed unless new connection is developed.

Support

Representation ID: 3295

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Grain Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Promoting site at Chichester Grain, Priors Leaze Road.
We support the allocation of land for a minimum of 1250 dwellings at Southbourne Parish and note from paragraph 6.89 that Southbourne Parish Council is preparing a revised neighbourhood plan for the parish which will identify potential development site(s).

Comment

Representation ID: 3336

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Domusea

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Support the allocation of land for a minimum of 1250 dwellings at Southbourne Parish.

3 promoted sites at 139 Wayside, Main Road, Southbourne (10 dwellings capacity), Land adjacent to Newton, Inlands Road, Southbourne (65 capacity) and land at Gordon Road, Southbourne (30 dwelling capacity). Combined with other larger sites as part of a dispersed strategy, they could contribute to housing supply in the early part of the plan period with the larger sites with longer lead in times coming later.

Object

Representation ID: 3350

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Question deliverability of allocation through NP process

Object

Representation ID: 3393

Received: 04/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Luken Beck MDP Ltd

Promoting site at 'Land at Woodfield Park Road'
Whilst we support the draft policy objective to deliver housing, employment, retail, social and community facilities at Southbourne through the Neighbourhood Plan process, the above policy wording predetermines how the emerging Neighbourhood Plan should distribute the identified local housing need and associated development. The requirement in the above wording for development to address all 16 criteria assumes a single site will come forward, as opposed to a number of sites which collectively could meet the 16 requirements, if planned for in advance.

Object

Representation ID: 3397

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Luken Beck MDP Ltd

Promoting site Land on Penny Lane.

Whilst we support the draft policy objective to deliver housing, employment, retail, social and community facilities at Southbourne through the Neighbourhood Plan process, the above policy wording predetermines how the emerging Neighbourhood Plan should distribute the identified local housing need and associated development. The requirement in the above wording for development to address all 16 criteria assumes a single site will come forward, as opposed to a number of sites which collectively could meet the 16 requirements, if planned for in advance.

Object

Representation ID: 3400

Received: 06/03/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Luken Beck MDP Ltd

Promoting site at Cooks Lane.

Whilst we support the draft policy objective to deliver housing, employment, retail, social and community facilities at Southbourne through the Neighbourhood Plan process, the above policy wording predetermines how the emerging Neighbourhood Plan should distribute the identified local housing need and associated development. The requirement in the above wording for development to address all 16 criteria assumes a single site will come forward, as opposed to a number of sites which collectively could meet the 16 requirements, if planned for in advance

Object

Representation ID: 3404

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Luken Beck MDP Ltd

Promoting site Land on Cooks Lane 2.

Whilst we support the draft policy objective to deliver housing, employment, retail, social and community facilities at Southbourne through the Neighbourhood Plan process, the above policy wording predetermines how the emerging Neighbourhood Plan should distribute the identified local housing need and associated development. The requirement in the above wording for development to address all 16 criteria assumes a single site will come forward, as opposed to a number of sites which collectively could meet the 16 requirements, if planned for in advance.

Object

Representation ID: 3493

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Sue and Geoff Talbot

Number of people: 2

Object on grounds that: new road bridge over railway line required for 1250 new dwellings; sufficient land unlikely to be found anywhere other than north of railway line - existing congestion at level crossing would be made worse; completion rate of 80 dwellings a year would lead to associated construction traffic for next 16 years; separate footbridge on east side of village and closure of existing at-level and uncontrolled pedestrian routes across railway line also required.

Policy AL 13 (4) too weak. Policy should require provision of new rail crossings to support proposals set out in current Neighbourhood Plan.

Object

Representation ID: 3498

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Sue and Geoff Talbot

Number of people: 2

Object on grounds that no proposals to manage additonal traffic on A259; infrastructure already inadequate; increasing storm water discharges; coalescence should be dealt with in SPG now; green space policy for Bournes area required.

Comment

Representation ID: 3501

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Sue and Geoff Talbot

Number of people: 2

The development of 1250 dwellings is likely to generate significant additional pressure on the Harbour and an increase in the need for public green space generally, which is already underprovided in the Parish.

Whilst green space proposed in NP via "Green Ring". a comprehensive green space policy for the Bournes area could reinforce its importance and help secure funding.

Object

Representation ID: 3504

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Sue and Geoff Talbot

Number of people: 2

Object to AL13 because we consider proposed development should deliver rather than address the items listed in the policy.