Policy S10: Local Centres, Local and Village Parades

Showing comments and forms 1 to 9 of 9

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 538

Received: 29/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Graeme Barrett

Representation Summary:

This Policy does nothing to enhance East Wittering centre

Full text:

Resident of West Wittering
This Policy does nothing to enhance East Wittering centre

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 670

Received: 31/01/2019

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Horn

Representation Summary:

It is essential that services and shops are vigorously encouraged. post offices and banking services along with a variety of shops are essential for smaller communties to survive.Incentives should be actively given .

Full text:

It is essential that services and shops are vigorously encouraged. post offices and banking services along with a variety of shops are essential for smaller communties to survive.Incentives should be actively given .

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 1173

Received: 31/01/2019

Respondent: Rawleigh Property Management Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Representation Summary:

Policy S9 and S10 both refer to local and village parades and village centres interchangeably which is confusing.

Full text:

The 'tests of soundness' for Local Plan preparation are set out in paragraph 35 of the NPPF2. They require the 2016-35 Local Plan to have been:
* Positively prepared - providing a strategy which, as a minimum, seeks to meet the
area's objectively assessed needs; and is informed by agreements with other authorities, so that unmet need from neighbouring areas is accommodated where it is practical to do so and is consistent with achieving sustainable development;
* Justified - an appropriate strategy, taking into account the reasonable alternatives, and based on proportionate evidence;
* Effective - deliverable over the plan period, and based on effective joint working on cross-boundary strategic matters that have been dealt with rather than deferred, as evidenced by the statement of common ground; and
* Consistent with national policy - enabling the delivery of sustainable development in accordance with the policies in this Framework.

We will deal with these matters more thoroughly at Submission stage but our headline comments to the Preferred Approach deal with the retail policies S9 and S10 in connection with the Broadbridge Business Centre Bosham.

The policies have been informed by the Chichester Retail and Main Town Centre Uses Study 2018 Final Report this being part of the evidence base for the Plan. Paragraph 9.12 states that Bosham has some retail uses and services, consistent with the role of a local centre, serving the immediate local catchment area. Table 11.4 identifies Bosham as a Local/Village Parade in the retail hierarchy. Table 10B at Appendix 2 has not identified the centre but refers to the 2 principal convenience goods destinations, 1) Co-op at Delling Lane (the Broadbridge Business Centre)
and 2) the Co-op at Station Road Broadbridge.

Policy S9 refers to Bosham as a 'village centre in the hierarchy to be defined in the
Neighbourhood Plan or Development Plan Document DPD' and applies the impact threshold of 250m2. It also states 'local centres including shopping parades and standalone shops form an important resource for businesses, visitors and residents. The expansion and additional provision of such facilities to a scale appropriate to the existing settlement or the planned expansion of that settlement will be welcomed by the Council provided it adds to the range and accessibility of
goods and services'.

Policy S10 is titled Local Centres: Local and Village Parades. Like policy S9 it encourages development at local centres but also includes local and village parades. It also refers to village centres.

Policy S9 and S10 both refer to local and village parades and village centres interchangeably which is confusing.

Policy S9 - Retail Hierarchy and Sequential Approach
The policy wording needs amending to make clear that additional retail will be supported at local centres and village centres including shopping parades and standalone shops. For consistency the policy should either refer to village centres in the hierarchy instead of local village parades.

Consideration should be given to elevating Bosham to a local centre especially given the significant planned additional growth of 250 dwellings proposed at Highgrove Farm in policy SA7. If this is accepted the impact threshold should also be raised to over 500m2. Importantly, the village centre (or local centre if Bosham is elevated to this in the hierarchy) must be defined in the next Submission version Local Plan and not left to a future Neighbourhood Plan or Site Allocations DPD. According to the local Development Scheme (2018-2021) the next DPD is not due to
be adopted until July 2022. We understand the Bosham Neighbourhood Plan is not being reviewed. Without this amendment allowing the definition of the Bosham village or local centre there would be no retail policy in place for Bosham until 2022 and potential retail development which would otherwise be welcomed by policy would be prevented from coming forward.

The Co-op at Broadbridge Business centre is larger than the store at Station Road. The business centre has other facilities including a doctor's surgery and some of the business units there already have an ancillary retail offer. It has ample ground level parking and is better suited as a retail destination than the Station Road parade.

We therefore recommend the Broadbridge Business Centre is defined in the Submission Plan as the retail centre of Bosham as shown on the attached plan edged blue. The centre should be at least a village centre although, with the potential 250 dwellings at Highcroft Farm, the centre would better be suited as local centre in the retail hierarchy.

Policy S10 - Local Centres, Local and Village Parades
As a corollary to our comments on S9, Policy S10 should be renamed Local Centres and Village Centres. The policy wording should confirm that within the defined centre loss of employment would not be a reason for allowing a change of use of an existing B1 use to A1 retail. The proposed amendments would benefit the Plan in meeting the tests of soundness, namely the positively prepared, effective and consistent with national planning policy tests.

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 1460

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Ms Paula Chatfield

Representation Summary:

Policy is not clear for local parades (e.g. The Ridgeway in Parklands) and stand-alone shops (e.g. One-Stop shops at St Paul's Road and The Broadway, Chichester). These are important community hubs/assets.
N.B. As a Committee member of Parklands' Residents' Association (PRA), please note that PRA may wish to pursue the subject of local parades/shops with CDC and with the Inspector at Examination in Public, if it is not adequately addressed.

Full text:

Para. 4.65 explains Local Centres and Village Centres but "Parades" are not mentioned. It is not clear whether Policy S10 also applies to local parades such as The Ridgeway at Parklands. "stand-alone shops", mentioned in passing in Policy S9 are not mentioned at all (examples include the One-Stop shops on St Paul's Road and The Broadway, both in Chichester).
Please clarify the application of para.s 4.72 to 4.74 and Policy S10 to these parades/shops that form a focal point for their communities and for passing trade, or recognise them in a separate policy provision.
Dependent on how it is clarified, I may have further comments

N.B. As a Committee member of Parklands' Residents' Association (PRA), please note that PRA may wish to pursue the subject of local parades with CDC and with the Inspector at Examination in Public, if it is not adequately addressed.

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 2591

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

The second paragraph within Policy S10 refers to "town centre uses". It is recommended that this is revised to "main town centre uses" to be consistent with the terminology used within the NPPF and within Policy S9.
The final paragraph within Policy S10 states: "Other uses will be granted where it has been demonstrated that all the following criteria have been met:"
This is ambiguous and it would benefit from additional clarity to confirm that the policy here is referringto proposals for a change of use at existing retail premises.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 2636

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Barton Willmore

Representation Summary:

Should be further provision for large scale/strategic developments where a greater retail provision can be supported without having a negative impact on the main centre.

Policy does not correlate with S9.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 2858

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: MR William Sharp

Representation Summary:

4.72 OBJECT to the phrase "Proposals which provide quality places for eating, drinking and fashion retailing would enhance the roles of these settlements." on basis that there is nowhere to accommodate new provision other than green fields. Provision on green fields is at odds with the Plan policy to enhance the District's rural character as a tourist and local amenity asset.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 2995

Received: 04/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Sharp

Representation Summary:

For a community to be vibrant, community activities need to be shared and well communicated - it is important that we don't neglect the "real world" of notices, signs and posters.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 3282

Received: 29/01/2019

Respondent: Westbourne Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support policy.

Full text:

See attachment