Local Plan 2045 Scoping Consultation
Other elements in this consultation
13. What evidence will be needed?
13.1Table 2 sets out the evidence documents which are likely to be needed to support the new local plan. However, the responses to this scoping consultation alongside discussions with key stakeholders will be important to informing the scope of the evidence required, particularly the evidence to assess constraints and determine necessary infrastructure.
13.2As part of discussions with key stakeholders we will also be considering whether existing evidence base studies are sufficiently up to date or can be updated or whether there is scope for cross-boundary work on evidence base documents, particularly in the context of local government reorganisation (LGR).
|
Key Evidence |
Area Covered (e.g. just LPA or broader) and purpose |
Key stakeholders’ who need to input |
|
Housing and Employment Needs Assessment (HEDNA) |
Plan area To assess housing and employment needs and define housing and functional economic market areas (HMA and FEMA), will consider all types of housing required including affordable and specialist housing in line with draft NPPF. Will also assess employment land supply and horticultural development land requirements. |
Internal housing, regeneration and economic development colleagues. Neighbouring authorities with overlapping HMAs and FEMAs |
|---|---|---|
|
Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Show People Accommodation Assessment (GTAA) |
Plan area To determine future gypsy and traveller and travelling showpeople accommodation needs. Including caravan and houseboat needs. |
Internal housing colleagues |
|
Retail, Leisure and Tourism Study including Town Centre Health Check |
Plan area. To determine the future need for retail, tourism and leisure growth. Health check to understand land uses present on high street in Chichester to assess performance of town centre. |
Internal regeneration, leisure, tourism and economic development colleagues. |
|
Renewable Energy Study |
Plan area – but potential for wider study area. To assess need for and potential for renewable energy |
Internal colleagues. |
|
Land Availability Assessment |
Plan area. To assess available land for development and other uses to be considered for the spatial strategy. Assessment of sites will determine suitability, availability and deliverability. |
Site promoters, parishes. Internal specialists to inform site assessment. |
|
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Level 1 and Level 2) including Coastal Change Management Area Assessment |
Plan area – but potential for wider study area. Potential to use adopted Local Plan SFRA Level 1 work. To understand risk of flooding from all sources, enable application of sequential and exception tests. To understand if need exists for coastal change management area. |
Environment Agency, Coastal Partners |
|
Water Cycle Study |
Plan area – but potential for wider study area linked to catchments. To understand water supply and wastewater capacity over plan period. |
Environment Agency, Natural England, Western Sussex Rivers Trust, water supply companies and wastewater companies. |
|
Landscape Character Assessment, Sensitivity, and Capacity Study and Gap Assessment |
Plan area – but potential for wider study area for character assessment, sensitivity and capacity. To identify the character of the landscape in the plan area, as a baseline for then assessing the sensitivity and capacity for change. Then assessing the impact of potential development and may include details on how to mitigate these impacts. Will also include identification of potential landscape gaps to avoid coalescence of settlements. |
Internal landscape specialist. Chichester Harbour National Landscape, South Downs National Park Authority, Parishes |
|
Settlement Hierarchy Study |
Plan area. A clear settlement hierarchy helps to ensure that developments are directed to the most sustainable locations within the plan areas. |
Parishes |
|
Settlement Boundary Review |
Plan area. Will use a standard methodology to amend settlement boundaries |
Parishes |
|
Density Study |
Plan area. Understand housing density to inform density standards |
N/A |
|
Design Evaluation |
Plan area This is essentially a new piece of evidence required in the draft NPPF, which states that it should entail an evaluation of the area’s existing characteristics and potential. |
Internal - Conservation Potential to do a focus group with local architects. |
|
Heritage |
Plan area The draft NPPF requires that it is necessary to identify the main heritage features within the plan area, including those heritage assets at most risk through neglect, decay or other threats, set out the key issues facing them and create a positive strategy for their conservation and enhancement, including where these assets can be used to support sustainable growth. |
Internal - Conservation |
|
Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study |
District wide. To inform IDP, site allocation policies and open space and recreational facilities standards. Identify shortfalls and potential surpluses of open space and sport and leisure facilities and identify open space which needs to be safeguarded. Will look at supply, including quality and accessibility of these spaces and provision. |
Internal leisure colleagues |
|
Green and Blue Infrastructure Study |
Plan area - but potential for wider area or combining with Open Space Study To map and assess the connectivity, quality and function of the green and blue infrastructure network. Including review of the Strategic Wildlife Corridors, opportunities for enhancing biodiversity, developing climate resilience and multifunctional use. |
Internal specialists, Local Nature Recovery Partnership, Natural England, Environment Agency |
|
Transport Modelling |
Plan area – but potential for wider model area for A27 corridor – providing sufficient level of detail to understand local plan impacts. Updated transport modelling is required to assess the transport impacts of development. |
National Highways, Local Highway Authority. |
|
Transport Study |
Plan area Setting baseline and then considering the transport impacts of the development levels proposed in the local plan. Setting a clear transport vision and validation framework to shift to sustainable transport use. |
National Highways, Local Highway Authority. |
|
Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) |
Plan area The IDP will assess the baseline infrastructure provision and assess the infrastructure provision required to support the level and distribution of growth |
Stakeholders who provide infrastructure services |
|
Equalities Impact Assessment (EqIA) |
Plan area. Ensures that the policies and allocations in the plan are fair and do not discriminate against any protected characteristic |
N/A |
|
Health Impact Assessment (HIA) |
Plan area. To evaluate the potential health effects of the proposed plan policies and allocations, to ensure decision making prioritises health and well-being, addresses health inequalities and minimises adverse effects on health |
WSCC HIA Team, Internal specialists |
|
Whole Plan Viability Report |
The viability assessment will assess the plan’s viability to ensure that the policies proposed will not undermine the deliverability of the plan and to ensure any strategic sites with on-site infrastructure are viable. |
Developers, infrastructure providers |
|
Strategic Environmental Assessment / Environmental Outcome Report |
Plan area Informs the development of the plan. |
Internal specialists |
|
Habitats Regulation Assessment |
Plan area. Determines whether plan proposals could negatively impact on designated protected European sites. |
Natural England, Environment Agency, Internal specialists |
Question 47: Have we identified the right evidence studies to support the Local Plan? If not, what else is needed and why? Comment
Question 48: Do you have any comments on the scope of any of the evidence studies? If yes, which study/ies and what else should be included? Comment
Question 49: The draft NPPF refers to design policies being informed by an evaluation of the area’s existing characteristics and potential, do you have any views on how that evidence should be produced? Comment
Question 50: The draft NPPF implies that a more extensive evidence base is now necessary in relation to heritage, as per policy HE1, how should that be produced? Comment