Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Object

Representation ID: 3329

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Para 4.22 refers to the housing need arising from the HEDNA. The housing requirement should be derived from local needs assessment based on standard methodology.

Object

Representation ID: 3330

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Presentation of LPR document is unclear as this paragraph references strategic allocations

Object

Representation ID: 3340

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Para 6.33 - the proposal to remove areas no longer required for development is inconsistent with AL4.

Object

Representation ID: 3341

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Reservations with respect to deliverability due to proximity to SINC, FLoodzones 2 and 3 on site and heritage assets.

Not sufficient information to conclude that the site is suitable for development.

Object

Representation ID: 3343

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Not enough evidence to demonstrate the suitability/deliverability of the site.
The site also scored poorly in the SA

Object

Representation ID: 3344

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Reservations with respect to deliverability of the site
e.g. impact on AONB/Landscape;
wastewater issues;
reliance on cars

Object

Representation ID: 3345

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Policies AL8-AL11, and AL13 allocate a housing number to each parish to be allocated by the relevant NPs.

Any housing that is expected to be provided through NPs cannot reasonably be relied upon during at least the first five years of the Plan.

It is unclear whether the Parish Council has agreed to accommodate such a significant level of growth as part of a NP.

For these reasons we question the deliverability of 350 homes at East Wittering through a NP process, particularly given the scale of other NP allocations relied upon elsewhere to meet the Council's minimum housing requirement.

Object

Representation ID: 3346

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Question deliverability of allocation through NP process

Object

Representation ID: 3347

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Question deliverability of allocation through NP process

Object

Representation ID: 3348

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: CEG

Agent: CEG and the Landowners (D C Heaver and Eurequity IC Limited)

Question deliverability of allocation through NP process