10.65

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4319

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Matthew Rees

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This long list of factors is not sound because it fails to take account of important matters and is therefore not sound.
The section is not legally compliant because there has been a failure to apply the principles in the statement of community involvement.

Change suggested by respondent:

Changes to the plan are provided below:

10.65There are a number of site-specific issues which should be considered when planning the development and site layout in this location, including:

Taking account of the Tangmere Neighbourhood Plan including the 'One Village' aspiration to integrate the new development with the existing village, and the other design considerations contained in the Neighbourhood Plan;

Local community aspirations for new/improved facilities serving the village, including transforming the existing village centre into a local centre focused around a village main street, primary education, and enhanced recreation;

The need to addressing requirements of existing dwellings in relation to strategic infrastructure prior to development, including addressing the flooding on Church Lane, and the need for the developer to provide surface water run-off infrastructure at Saxon Meadow given that these existing dwellings rely on soak-away on the surrounding agricultural land;

The need for Southern Water to fully adopted waste water infrastructure; and the requirement for full fibre internet and modern telecommunication services to be available to residents of Saxon Meadow;

Potential physical constraints such as landscape sensitivities, particularly external views from the surrounding area including the Tangmere conservation area itself, Oving, the South Downs National Park;

High groundwater levels, particularly in the southern part of the site and Church Lane, and the need for noise mitigation measures for residential properties on the A27, for example through the use of acoustic screening;

Conserving, enhancing and better revealing the known archaeological assets within the site, to advance understanding of the significance of the assets;

Conserving and enhancing the setting of the historic village, particularly the Conservation Area and the views from within it looking out;

Appropriate separation distances from new properties, and need to avoid segmenting existing open spaces into small plots that reduce amenity value;

The archaeological and heritage assets within the surrounding area, and preserving the heritage of the World War Il airfield, Commonwealth War Graves, including provision for the relocation of existing allotment space that could facilitate the expansion or relocation of the Tangmere Military Aviation Museum;

The opportunity to provide off-site green links with existing and planned development at Tangmere, and with the South Downs National Park and Chichester city, and the potential to develop strategic green infrastructure in conjunction with other planned development to the east of Chichester City;

Opportunities, in partnership with relevant authorities, to provide improved sustainable public transport routes linking the village with Chichester city, to improve cycle routes to the city, and better transport links to Barnham rail station and the 'Five Villages' area in Arun District and the reinstatement of a train stop between Oving and Tangmere on the existing train line; and

The availability of minerals in the vicinity and the need to take account of the Minerals Safeguarding Area.

Full text:

There is much to commend in this document and the supporting technical documents that accompany it, and I have listed in the appendix to this letter 26 such paragraphs and policies. I am happy for my support to be registered against these sections of your consultation document. There is also much upon which I must represent a concern, so I attach representations relating to 22 paragraphs or policies.

I am happy to participate in a hearing session, and I would flag at this stage that the common theme that links all of these representations is the need to safeguard the natural and built environment in and around Saxon Meadow, Tangmere from the risks of unsustainable development, I consider that the independent examiner should focus their review on the aspects of the local plan that relate to this matter.

Appendix 1: list of policies that I support
1. P14, 1.23, 1.24: Duty to cooperate
2. P24, para 2.30 "the council declared a climate emergency in July 2019"
3. P24, para 2.32 — "all proposal for new development should be considered in the context of a climate emergencV'
4, P30: Objective 2: natural environment: "development will achieve net gains in biodiversity'
5. P43, 4.1 "National policy promotes increasing energy efficiency, the minimisation of energy consumption and the development of renewable energy sources"
6. P43, 4.3: "Some renewable energy projects provide significant opportunities to enhance biodiversitV'
7. P53, Policy NE5: Biodiversity and Biodiversity Net Gain
8. P62, Para 4.42: Hedgerows and some types of woodlands are identified as a priority habitat
9, P62, Policy NE8: Proposals should have a minimum buffer zone of 15 metres from the boundary of ancient woodland or veteran trees to avoid rood damage (known as the root protection area)
10. P68, Policy NEIO: Criteria for Development in the Countryside - Does not prejudice viable agricultural operations or other viable uses
11. P80, Para 4.91: There are serious concerns about the impact of flooding, both in respect of current properties at risk but also the long-term management of the area.
12. 4.92: any development in the plan area must therefore have regard to flood and erosion risk.
13. 4.94: built development can lead to increased surface water run-off; therefore, new development should include SuDS to help cope with intense rainfall events
14. P81, Para 4.96: Environment Agency consent is required for any works within 16 m of tidal waters and 8m of fluvial watercourses in line with the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2016. This strip is required for access. The policy includes a setback requirement to ensure this access strip is not obstructed.
15. P80, 4.92, Any development in the plan area must therefore have regard to flood and erosion risk, now and in the future, by way of location and specific measures, such as additional flood alleviation, which will protect people, properties and vulnerable habitats from flooding. Recent changes to national guidance highlight the importance of considering flood risk from all sources, and this is particularly significant for the plan area as large parts of it are at risk from groundwater flooding, which needs to be recognised in development decisions alongside the well-established risks in relation to tidal, fluvial and surface water flooding. Appropriate mapping of all sources of flood risks is still evolving, and is likely to develop further over the plan period
16. P93, Policy NE20 Pollution: Development proposals must be designed to protect, and where possible, improve upon the amenities of existing and future residents, occupiers of buildings and the environment generally. Development proposals will need to address the criteria contained in, but not limited to, the policies concerning water quality; flood risk and water management; nutrient mitigation; lighting; air quality; noise; and contaminated land. Where development is likely to generate significant adverse impacts by reason of pollution, the council will require that the impacts are minimised and/or mitigated to an acceptable level within appropriate local/national standards, guidance, legislation and/or objectives.
17, P94, 4.127, Light pollution caused by excessive brightness can lead to annoyance, disturbance and impact wildlife, notably nocturnal animals. The design of lighting schemes should be carefully considered in development proposals to prevent light spillage and glare.
18. P94, 4.128, Dark skies are important for the conservation of natural habitats, cultural heritage and astronomy. The plan area includes three 'Dark Sky Discovery Site' designations, all located within the Chichester Harbour AONB; Eames Farm on Thorney Island, Maybush Copse in Chidham; and north of the John Q Davis footpath in West Itchenor. Development within or directly impacting these areas will be subject to particular scrutiny in terms of their impact on dark skies. The entire SDNPA area is also declared as an International Dark Sky Reserve. Development directly impacting this area will be subject to similar scrutiny.
19. P96, Policy NE22 Air Quality
20. P97, Policy NE-23 Noise
21. P142, Para 6.29, Amenity: Private space, shared space and the design quality and construction of communal spaces all contribute to amenity
22. P155-6, Policy P11:Conservation Areas "protecting the setting (including views into and out of the area)"
23, P55, Para 4.26 - The council is under a legal duty to protect designated habitats, by ensuring that new development does not have an adverse impact on important areas of nature conservation, and by requiring mitigation to negate the harm caused.
24. P58, Para 4.33 The council is under a legal duty to protect their designated bird populations and supporting habitats
25. P95, Para 4.129 The council has a duty to review and assess air quality within the district
26. P301, Conservation Area: An area of special architectural or historic interest, designated under the Planning (Listed Buildings & Conservation Areas) Act 1990. There is a statutory duty to preserve or enhance the character, appearance, or setting of these areas.

Attachments:

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4452

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Mr John Wolfenden

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The ‘one village’ is a ‘sham’ as explained 10.63.
The only improvement to new facilities is two year primary school of no specified size.
A playing / recreation area needs definition there is already a recreation space.
You have ignored / forgotten increased policing required, lack of local health facilities, higher groundwater levels
Conservation area - why have rules not been expanded to new development. No dishes, aerial’s, solar panels, windows facing open ground, wood burners, etc
Allotments - majority have objected, issues (sheds, poly tunnels, compost bins, cold frames, paving, ground clearance, fencing, water supply).

Change suggested by respondent:

You need to reduce the proposed from 1300 to a more sustainable and realistic increase bearing in mind the doubling of the size of the community without proper regard to infrastructure in schooling , green space, environmental impact , social impact of highly mixed lower income community with higher density and increased social issues.
This plan does not go far enough in the assurance of any of these issues.

Full text:

The ‘one village’ is a ‘sham’ as explained 10.63
The only improvement to new facilities is two year primary school of no specified size.
A playing / recreation area needs definition there is already a recreation space.
You have ignored / forgotten Increased policing required, Lack of local health facilities , higher groundwater levels
Conservation area - why have rules not been expanded to new development. No dishes, aerial’s, solar panels, windows facing open ground, wood burners, etc
Allotments - majority have objected , issues (sheds ,poly tunnels , compost bins , cold frames ,paving ,ground clearance, fencing, water supply)