10.59

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4133

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Matthew Rees

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Not sound because it fails to provide essential information needed understand how the proposed scale of new development of 1 ,300 homes compares to the existing location, so this must be modified to reference that Tangmere had 1,156 dwellings (Tangmere Neighbourhood Plan 2016). This is needed to draw out the important comparator of the prospect of an increase of more than 100%. References to road A27 cannot be used in the plan without clear reference to the high levels of traffic congestion that are present development, which is a material consideration that the plan state cannot be addressed through developer contributions alone (para 8.4) and funding is not guaranteed (para 8.5). Not sound unless it acknowledges that there is 20ha of unmet demand for horticultural land in Tangmere.

Change suggested by respondent:

Modification is required to incorporate the missing facts that make the statement sound:

10.59 Tangmere is the largest village in the area to the east of Chichester city, has 1,156 dwellings, one convenience store, a shop that sells wedding dresses, fuel station, primary school, GP surgery and village hall, and road accessibility via the congested A27. There are extensive site-specific constraints at this site with land being used currently for viable agriculture, and there is unmet demand for 20ha of horticulture land in Tangmere.

Full text:

There is much to commend in this document and the supporting technical documents that accompany it, and I have listed in the appendix to this letter 26 such paragraphs and policies. I am happy for my support to be registered against these sections of your consultation document. There is also much upon which I must represent a concern, so I attach representations relating to 22 paragraphs or policies.

I am happy to participate in a hearing session, and I would flag at this stage that the common theme that links all of these representations is the need to safeguard the natural and built environment in and around Saxon Meadow, Tangmere from the risks of unsustainable development, I consider that the independent examiner should focus their review on the aspects of the local plan that relate to this matter.

Appendix 1: list of policies that I support
1. P14, 1.23, 1.24: Duty to cooperate
2. P24, para 2.30 "the council declared a climate emergency in July 2019"
3. P24, para 2.32 — "all proposal for new development should be considered in the context of a climate emergencV'
4, P30: Objective 2: natural environment: "development will achieve net gains in biodiversity'
5. P43, 4.1 "National policy promotes increasing energy efficiency, the minimisation of energy consumption and the development of renewable energy sources"
6. P43, 4.3: "Some renewable energy projects provide significant opportunities to enhance biodiversitV'
7. P53, Policy NE5: Biodiversity and Biodiversity Net Gain
8. P62, Para 4.42: Hedgerows and some types of woodlands are identified as a priority habitat
9, P62, Policy NE8: Proposals should have a minimum buffer zone of 15 metres from the boundary of ancient woodland or veteran trees to avoid rood damage (known as the root protection area)
10. P68, Policy NEIO: Criteria for Development in the Countryside - Does not prejudice viable agricultural operations or other viable uses
11. P80, Para 4.91: There are serious concerns about the impact of flooding, both in respect of current properties at risk but also the long-term management of the area.
12. 4.92: any development in the plan area must therefore have regard to flood and erosion risk.
13. 4.94: built development can lead to increased surface water run-off; therefore, new development should include SuDS to help cope with intense rainfall events
14. P81, Para 4.96: Environment Agency consent is required for any works within 16 m of tidal waters and 8m of fluvial watercourses in line with the Environmental Permitting Regulations 2016. This strip is required for access. The policy includes a setback requirement to ensure this access strip is not obstructed.
15. P80, 4.92, Any development in the plan area must therefore have regard to flood and erosion risk, now and in the future, by way of location and specific measures, such as additional flood alleviation, which will protect people, properties and vulnerable habitats from flooding. Recent changes to national guidance highlight the importance of considering flood risk from all sources, and this is particularly significant for the plan area as large parts of it are at risk from groundwater flooding, which needs to be recognised in development decisions alongside the well-established risks in relation to tidal, fluvial and surface water flooding. Appropriate mapping of all sources of flood risks is still evolving, and is likely to develop further over the plan period
16. P93, Policy NE20 Pollution: Development proposals must be designed to protect, and where possible, improve upon the amenities of existing and future residents, occupiers of buildings and the environment generally. Development proposals will need to address the criteria contained in, but not limited to, the policies concerning water quality; flood risk and water management; nutrient mitigation; lighting; air quality; noise; and contaminated land. Where development is likely to generate significant adverse impacts by reason of pollution, the council will require that the impacts are minimised and/or mitigated to an acceptable level within appropriate local/national standards, guidance, legislation and/or objectives.
17, P94, 4.127, Light pollution caused by excessive brightness can lead to annoyance, disturbance and impact wildlife, notably nocturnal animals. The design of lighting schemes should be carefully considered in development proposals to prevent light spillage and glare.
18. P94, 4.128, Dark skies are important for the conservation of natural habitats, cultural heritage and astronomy. The plan area includes three 'Dark Sky Discovery Site' designations, all located within the Chichester Harbour AONB; Eames Farm on Thorney Island, Maybush Copse in Chidham; and north of the John Q Davis footpath in West Itchenor. Development within or directly impacting these areas will be subject to particular scrutiny in terms of their impact on dark skies. The entire SDNPA area is also declared as an International Dark Sky Reserve. Development directly impacting this area will be subject to similar scrutiny.
19. P96, Policy NE22 Air Quality
20. P97, Policy NE-23 Noise
21. P142, Para 6.29, Amenity: Private space, shared space and the design quality and construction of communal spaces all contribute to amenity
22. P155-6, Policy P11:Conservation Areas "protecting the setting (including views into and out of the area)"
23, P55, Para 4.26 - The council is under a legal duty to protect designated habitats, by ensuring that new development does not have an adverse impact on important areas of nature conservation, and by requiring mitigation to negate the harm caused.
24. P58, Para 4.33 The council is under a legal duty to protect their designated bird populations and supporting habitats
25. P95, Para 4.129 The council has a duty to review and assess air quality within the district
26. P301, Conservation Area: An area of special architectural or historic interest, designated under the Planning (Listed Buildings & Conservation Areas) Act 1990. There is a statutory duty to preserve or enhance the character, appearance, or setting of these areas.

Attachments:

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4414

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs Coleen Ayton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I feel this is not justified as it does not take into account of reasonable alleviations.

Increasing the houses in Tangmere by doubling the volume from 1,100 houses at present by another 1,300 without any infrastructure in place i.e. roads/medical centre/school.

Change suggested by respondent:

Reduce the number of houses proposed by two-thirds.

Full text:

I feel this is not justified as it does not take into account of reasonable alleviation.

Increasing the houses in Tangmere by doubling the volume from 1,100 houses at present by another 1,300 without any infrastructure in place i.e. roads/medical centre/school.

Attachments:

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4417

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Mr John Wolfenden

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The range of facilities is limited to small Co-op grocery store with combined post office and a wedding dress shop. You have vastly underestimated the needs for a community you propose to double in size. The only provision is for a 5-7 year old nursery. Vastly inadequate, no consideration for upper schooling. GP Surgery is currently not taking any new patients, inadequate resource for proposed expansion. Road access not good - with extra 2500 cars requiring access.

Change suggested by respondent:

You need to recognise the complete inadequacy of the existing grocery shops for an additional 2500 -3000 people. You need to make provision for upper school places. You need to develop a expanded medical centre plan. Your traffic estimates will need revision to your access to M27. You have no policing plan. What about Dental amenities? Flooding issues in Church Lane not addressed. No consideration in the plan for protected wildlife species newts and bats. Allotments move to Church Lane has been heavily opposed by allotment folk due to flooding of the proposed new site.

Full text:

The range of the facilities is limited to small Co-Op grocery store with combined post office and a a wedding dress shop.
You have vastly underestimated the needs for a community you propose to double in size.
The only provision is for a 5-7 year old nursery. Vastly inadequate, no consideration for upper schooling.
GP Surgery is currently no taking any new patients, inadequate resource for proposed expansion.
Road access Not good - with extra 2500 cars requiring access.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4433

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Brian Ayton

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I feel that this is not sound as it fails to detail essential information to understand how the development of another 1,300 houses and the impact this will have on the road A27 without clear reference to the already high levels of traffic congestion.

Change suggested by respondent:

The monitor and manage strategy needs to be changed to predict and provide future infrastructure to improve the congestion problems on the A27 and all surrounding roads in Chichester.

Full text:

Paragraph 10.61 is not sound as it is inconsistent with the sustainability appraisal as it does not protect the natural environment. I am very concerned to the extent and proximity of the proposed housing development to Saxon Meadow.

Attachments:

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4538

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Mr John Newsom

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The plan is not sound because the increased traffic and number of cars using Tangmere Road will impact on the dangers of the T-junction at Tangmere Road (with Church Lane). There are already incidents at this junction and the sheer volume of traffic is likely to increase the number of incidents/accidents at this junction. The volume of traffic in relation to the proposed 1300 houses given that each home is likely to have at least one car owner (conservative estimate) will impact on the dangers posed by the T junction to road users. The visibility is [word unclear] poor at this T junction (Church lane and Tangmere Road).

Change suggested by respondent:

Road safety around this T junction needs to be [words unclear] for traffic/road usage to improve the visibility around it to minimise the potential for an increase in accidents as a direct result of increased traffic and road use. The sheer density of the traffic form the development means that improved visibility and road safety around it is paramount. A detailed analysis [word unclear] needs to be done to assess how best to improve road safety at this junction for all road users (drivers, pedestrians, cyclists etc).

Full text:

See representations

Attachments:

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5574

Received: 17/03/2023

Respondent: Morag Mills

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Plan unsound due to strain of additional housing on existing infrastructure including: road network and congestion; GP surgery at capacity; impact on air quality.

Change suggested by respondent:

Significantly reduce the density of the planned building and reduce the number of homes proposed. Invest properly in road infrastructure to cater for the increased demand and provide alternative options for transport e.g. a railway to give people a viable option other than using their cars. A proper survey about the impact of the development on existing infrastructure should be carried out.

Full text:

The plan is not sound because it does not consider the additional burden 1300 houses will place on the infrastructure around Saxon meadow and the village of Tangmere which is already at breaking point and under enormous pressure. For example, the roads are inadequate to deal with the existing traffic, the GPs' surgery is full which means it is already difficult to get an appintment - how will it cope with additional demand. Also the access to the ambulance distribution points needs to remain clear and the amount of traffic caused by the sheer volume and number of cars without proper investment in the roads will create gridlock/congestion. Insufficient consideration of the infrastructure and investment in it to cater for the additional homes proposed means the policy is not sound Increase traffic will impact on the quality of air.

Attachments: