Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Support

Representation ID: 4053

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

Ref. Policy A13, paras. 7,10,11,12,14,15&16

Consistent with objectives and policies included in the Southbourne Submission NP which is currently at Regulation 16 consultation stage

Support noted.

Object

Representation ID: 4055

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Clarification is needed of what supporting facilities will consist of.

This is referenced in the supporting text (paragraph 10.56), Policy A13 and the IDP.

Object

Representation ID: 4057

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The PC has not been consulted about the increase in gypsies, travellers and show people accommodation within the development.

Comments noted. See also respondent’s representation to Policies H11 (5247), H12 (5248) and A13 (5241).

Support

Representation ID: 4059

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

The PC is committed to support endeavours to maintain and enhance the work of CHC in the AONB. Areas outside the AONB which are used for bird feeding etc could also be affected by development.

Comments noted. Criterion 10 of Policy A13 requires the provision of mitigation to ensure any adverse effects, including the loss of functionally linked supporting habitat, are avoided.

Support

Representation ID: 4061

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

Maintenance of landscape gaps between settlements are crucial.

Comments noted.

Support

Representation ID: 4062

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

Ref. bullet point 2
There is currently insufficient infrastructure which needs addressing in addition to new facilities which the PC would support. Provision of improved transport links to mitigate delays at level crossings are crucial.

Comments noted.

Support

Representation ID: 4064

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

Ref Bullet point 3.
The ChEm route is a crucial part of this para. as well as a pedestrian bridge over the railway.

Agree that it would be useful to add reference to the proposed ChEm route.

Support

Representation ID: 4065

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

Ref Bullet point 5
The two Wildlife Corridors (Lumley Stream and Ham Brook) and the proposed Green Ring play crucial parts in the aspirations of this paragraph.

Comments noted.

Support

Representation ID: 4066

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

This is a very important statement and SPC support it. The SPC will object to any piecemeal development applications until the Strategic Development Allocation is decided.

Comments noted.

Object

Representation ID: 4069

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Southbourne Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

With two Wildlife corridors within Southbourne Parish boundaries we very much support their creation and safe guarding. The only caveat to this is that the newly included Nutbourne to Hambrook corridor is NOT wide enough at its northern end, missing out major water vole networks.

Comment noted. The width of the corridor needs to be based on technical information relating to location and presence of species. The corridor is considered to be functional based on its current width, and it is not considered justified to widen the corridor in the absence of further technical evidence