10.66

Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4082

Received: 14/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Tim Swann

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

The bus service is not worth of note -it goes 2days a week and doesn't give you time to do anything at the final destination.
The plan notes the issues of the A27 however does not considered the impact on the the A281 whihc is the main route to employment in Guildford/London which has the added pressure of the development of Dunsfold which will be over 10000 dwellings.

Change suggested by respondent:

The plan need to recognize there is no viable bus service and people will use cars on roads which are under pressure from other developments so until there is a viable public transport system the area needs to remain as rural development with a low level of growth.

Full text:

The bus service is not worth of note -it goes 2days a week and doesn't give you time to do anything at the final destination.
The plan notes the issues of the A27 however does not considered the impact on the the A281 whihc is the main route to employment in Guildford/London which has the added pressure of the development of Dunsfold which will be over 10000 dwellings.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4626

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Antony Loader

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

The plan does not comply with all relevant requirements of the Planning & compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 as amended. It doesn't meet the CDC's Sustainability Appraisal Report when judged against other reasonable options due to both the lack of infrastructure (Extremely limited bus service and Loxwod no longer meets the criteria of a service village as it has no shop) and lack of sustainability. It also fails to meet environmental requirements. There are numerous other points but can't be made in 100 words!

Change suggested by respondent:

The number of 220 additional new houses allocated to Loxwood should be removed from the plan and the the figure previously allocated with sites democratically chosen by residents remaining. Loxwood should not be described as a Service Village due to the lack of village shop and extremely limited public transport.

Full text:

The plan does not comply with all relevant requirements of the Planning & compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 as amended. It doesn't meet the CDC's Sustainability Appraisal Report when judged against other reasonable options due to both the lack of infrastructure (Extremely limited bus service and Loxwod no longer meets the criteria of a service village as it has no shop) and lack of sustainability. It also fails to meet environmental requirements. There are numerous other points but can't be made in 100 words!

Attachments: