10.45
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 3894
Received: 07/03/2023
Respondent: The Bosham Association
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
This paragraph makes no reference to protecting the existing settlement at Broadbridge from flooding. The flood risk data is not conclusive that the site will not flood and the assessment is arguably out of date with many of the tests carried out in 2014 and groundwater tests carried out in 2016/2017. The site is prone to flooding at the western boundary which adjoins Brooks Lane. Brooks Lane is already prone to flooding.
Policy A11 should be removed from the plan as the NPPF makes it clear that when determining any planning application, local planning authorities should ensure flood risk is not increased elsewhere.
This paragraph makes no reference to protecting the existing settlement at Broadbridge from flooding. The flood risk data is not conclusive that the site will not flood and the assessment is arguably out of date with many of the tests carried out in 2014 and groundwater tests carried out in 2016/2017. The site is prone to flooding at the western boundary which adjoins Brooks Lane. Brooks Lane is already prone to flooding.
Support
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 4922
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: Willowfield Farm
These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.
These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.
These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6190
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: Willowfield Farm
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.
These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.
These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.