10.45

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 3894

Received: 07/03/2023

Respondent: The Bosham Association

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

This paragraph makes no reference to protecting the existing settlement at Broadbridge from flooding. The flood risk data is not conclusive that the site will not flood and the assessment is arguably out of date with many of the tests carried out in 2014 and groundwater tests carried out in 2016/2017. The site is prone to flooding at the western boundary which adjoins Brooks Lane. Brooks Lane is already prone to flooding.

Change suggested by respondent:

Policy A11 should be removed from the plan as the NPPF makes it clear that when determining any planning application, local planning authorities should ensure flood risk is not increased elsewhere.

Full text:

This paragraph makes no reference to protecting the existing settlement at Broadbridge from flooding. The flood risk data is not conclusive that the site will not flood and the assessment is arguably out of date with many of the tests carried out in 2014 and groundwater tests carried out in 2016/2017. The site is prone to flooding at the western boundary which adjoins Brooks Lane. Brooks Lane is already prone to flooding.

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4922

Received: 17/03/2023

Respondent: Willowfield Farm

Representation Summary:

These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.

Change suggested by respondent:

These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.

Full text:

These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6190

Received: 17/03/2023

Respondent: Willowfield Farm

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.

Change suggested by respondent:

These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.

Full text:

These 'specific issues' are exactly why the allocation should be split, between this site and HBO0003 allowing for lower density and more mitigation measures.