10.21
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 3895
Received: 07/03/2023
Respondent: Mr Edward Bowring
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
The A259 in Fishbourne is already at capacity, with tailbacks from A27 roundabout to the village at rush hour. The road simply can not take any extra traffic as it currently is. The A259 and Clay lane road surfaces are not maintained well enough for the current flow, let alone for the planned new development from Chichester to Southbourne. Our homes on the A259 already shake from passing large vehicles, especially when the A27 is shut. Trying to cross the A259 as a pedestrian with children is already dangerous enough.
Only allow a number of new homes in line with what the current road network can handle and protect Chichester harbour AONB and wild life corridors from further pollution. For the roads to be better maintained before any new major development is permitted. To install 20mph zones for A259 villages and more pedestrian road crossings so people can cross safely. Consider alternative routes to the A259 when the A27 is closed.
The A259 in Fishbourne is already at capacity, with tailbacks from A27 roundabout to the village at rush hour. The road simply can not take any extra traffic as it currently is. The A259 and Clay lane road surfaces are not maintained well enough for the current flow, let alone for the planned new development from Chichester to Southbourne. Our homes on the A259 already shake from passing large vehicles, especially when the A27 is shut. Trying to cross the A259 as a pedestrian with children is already dangerous enough.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 4835
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: Miller Homes and Vistry Group
Agent: Mr Nick Billington
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
To avoid confusion and compliance with the NPPF, this bullet point should be updated to reflect criterion 13 of the Policy A6 wording. The proposals are designed to maintain Green Field run off rates and does not increase flood risk off site, taking account of climate change. It does this by utilizing high quality Sustainable Drainage features which attenuate surface water whilst providing landscape and ecological benefits. There is no NPPF requirement to reduce flows below Green Field run off rates and to do so could have unintended consequences. The bullet point should be updated to reflect the NPPF requirements.
To avoid confusion and compliance with the NPPF, this bullet point should be updated to reflect criterion 13 of the Policy A6 wording.
To avoid confusion and compliance with the NPPF, this bullet point should be updated to reflect criterion 13 of the Policy A6 wording. The proposals are designed to maintain Green Field run off rates and does not increase flood risk off site, taking account of climate change. It does this by utilizing high quality Sustainable Drainage features which attenuate surface water whilst providing landscape and ecological benefits. There is no NPPF requirement to reduce flows below Green Field run off rates and to do so could have unintended consequences. The bullet point should be updated to reflect the NPPF requirements.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5099
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: Miller Homes and Vistry Group
Agent: Mr Nick Billington
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Regarding bullet "increasing capacity to attenuate surface water..."
To avoid confusion and ensure compliance with the NPPF, this bullet point should be updated to reflect criterion 13 of the Policy A6 wording. The proposal is designed to maintain Green Field run off rates and does not increase flood risk off site, taking account of climate change. It does this by utilizing high quality Sustainable Drainage features which attenuate surface water whilst providing landscape and ecological benefits. There
is no NPPF requirement to reduce flows below Green Field run off rates and to do so could have unintended consequences.
The bullet point should be updated to reflect the NPPF requirements.
Miller and Vistry are broadly supportive of this policy, having committed to deliver significant levels of new public open space on site. However, it is not clear from the policy what the expectations are in terms of which developments would be expected to provide indoor facilities. Given the complex nature and cost of providing indoor sports facilities, there should not be an expectation to provide such facilities unless they have formed part of the early masterplanning of the site. The West of Chichester development is masterplanned to provide space for indoor sport within the Community Building at the center of the site, along with suitable outdoor facilities.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5929
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: GoVia Thameslink Railway
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
This land is close enough to Chichester City Centre that it can be developed as an active travel development, with no generation of traffic except service and delivery vehicles, buses, and blue badge holders. Off site traffic generation should be kept to a minimum with improvements focused on active travel and bus priority, not other capacity for additional cars.
See attached.