Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 886

Received: 03/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Roderick Gill

Representation Summary:

Hunston should not be considered as part of the city for housing development. Infrastructure cannot deal with the housing development. Other options such as Mundham or Lavant have better infrastructure options and acces to 'travel on'.

Full text:

Housing requirement for Hunston may have been misjudged as it seems to have been based on it being part of the the city requiment. Why, because it is the opinion of planners that Oving/Drayton is unsustainable and that Mundham for unclear reasons is also not suitable despite it having clear advantages over Hunston. Better road options, availability of land for instance. Building at Hunston should not be decided simply on its proximity or social standinf in comparison to other areas. Extensive housing in Hunston does not reduce the need to travel, it will add to the already unacceptable levls of congestion, there being no other traffic options to gain access to the A27, or rail service.