Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 65

Received: 04/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Stephen Jupp

Representation Summary:

The difference between Option 1 and 1A is said to be that option 1A reduces the scale of development on Manhood and redistributes it to Southbourne, Hunston and Tangmere.

However for some reason Chidham and Hambrook allocation reduces from 600 in Option 1 to 500 in Option 1A and there is no explanation or justification for this reduction.

The 600 unit allocation for Hambrook in Option 1 should have been carried forward in Option 1A as it has a railway station and the 700 bus route.

Then reduce 200 unit allocation for hunston to 100 as it less sustainable location

Full text:

The difference between Option 1 and 1A is said to be that option 1A reduces the scale of development on Manhood and redistributes it to Southbourne, Hunston and Tangmere.

However for some reason Chidham and Hambrook allocation reduces from 600 in Option 1 to 500 in Option 1A and there is no explanation or justification for this reduction.

The 600 unit allocation for Hambrook in Option 1 should have been carried forward in Option 1A as it has a railway station and the 700 bus route.

Then reduce 200 unit allocation for hunston to 100 as it less sustainable location