Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 648
Received: 31/01/2019
Respondent: Mrs Fiona Horn
Again not enough detail. Nice to have these ideas of schools etc but they are put in the plan and never built (ie Graylingwell) just to get the plan accepted. Great in theory but services have to be put in first otherwise more people have to travel to access schools , doctors etc. Forward planning has to be used and instigated to make communities work and cut unnecessary traffic journeys.again no inclusion of villages in the north around Goodwood.Biased plan
Again not enough detail. Nice to have these ideas of schools etc but they are put in the plan and never built (ie Graylingwell) just to get the plan accepted. Great in theory but services have to be put in first otherwise more people have to travel to access schools , doctors etc. Forward planning has to be used and instigated to make communities work and cut unnecessary traffic journeys.again no inclusion of villages in the north around Goodwood.Biased plan