Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 527

Received: 26/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Chris Coffin

Representation Summary:

I believe the Plan requirement for 250 additional dwellings will have a serious and negative impact:
* Any significant increase in village population will be unviable without matching, significant additions to all aspects of local infrastructure and services. Insufficient local retail, school, medical and road provision. There is a continuous rise of "rat run" traffic and roads which are in poor and unsafe condition.
* Proposal to meet the Plan's development target for Fishbourne by building on Bethwines Farm. By any criterion this is unjustified and will cause harm. It would adversely change the individual identity Fishbourne (contrary S20).

Full text:

I wish to make the following brief representations on the draft Local Plan, now out for consultation:

General - I support the methodology of the Strategic Policies and thank the Council for the comprehensive and thorough nature of the Plan.

Goodwood Motor Circuit and Airfield (S15) - I thoroughly endorse the Council's policy of qualified support for this important local attraction and its development as it produces a huge net benefit to the area.

Fishbourne Parish (AL9) - This is the area in which I am resident.
I believe the Plan requirement for 250 additional dwellings will have a serious and negative impact on Fishbourne village for the following reasons:
* Any significant increase in village population will be unviable without matching, significant additions to all aspects of local infrastructure and services (S12). At present there is insufficient local retail, school, medical and road provision. There is a continuous rise of "rat run" traffic over our minor roads which are in an increasing poor and unsafe condition.
* There is a proposal to meet the Plan's development target for Fishbourne by building on Bethwines Farm. By any criterion this is unjustified and will cause harm (as well as dismay). It would, above all, adversely change the individual identity Fishbourne (contrary to the tenets of Plan overall design policy (S20)).