Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4510

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Glyn Woodage

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Loxwood is not suitable for a further escalation of development on this scale, due to the many sustainability issues. The village is not ideally located and is totally car dependent. All Infrastructure in the village is historically weak and continues to be so. Development on this planned scale would destroy the villages character and vernacular, without a meaningful benefit to the area as a whole.

Change suggested by respondent:

The group of so called "North villages" once formed part of the Petworth district. Petworth has enormous potential to offer easily all of this housing requirement in a sensitive development to the South-west of the current town. The town, could be regenerated and provide all including the aging population of the area, with a great place to live, that absorbs most of the outlined pressures of a balanced solution.

Full text:

The plan for Loxwood has not realistically assessed the villages suitability or capability to accommodate this huge increase in housing numbers and only refers to an already over subscribed health-centre as the main attribute. I don't believe that sustainability was seriously considered in reaching your numbers and aspirations of this scale. I need not remind you Loxwood does not currently have a village shop and lacks any major employment opportunities. Therefore only a car journey of not much under a minimum of 30 minutes each way, one hour in total is needed to facilitate this and if Crawley is your destination this can be doubled. The location of Loxwood is remote and requires using a transport method that is not aligned with the climate emergency on a road network that quite frankly is seriously lacking!