Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 405
Received: 27/01/2019
Respondent: Mr Franck R. M. Petitgas
The land is grade one/two agricultural.
No waste water management plan
Fears that building will significantly increase flooding (on and offsite) given high water table.
Clear loss to eco-systems and wild life corridors, resulting in habitat fragmentation.
Dammage the setting of the National Park, & AONB generally
Wreck the distinctiveness of Fishbourne and Bosham
Zero evidence (in the Document) to justify the proposed two form entry primary school
Zero thought how to relieve present traffic, never mind future congestion and worse air quality.
Development uses the beauty of the area and destroys it by same token.
My objections are supported by the following considerations:
1. The land is grade one/two agricultural.
2. There is no waste water management plan (drainage, sewerage)
3. There are real fears that building will significantly increase flooding (on and offsite) due to the high water table.
4. There would be considerable loss to eco-systems and wild life corridors, resulting in habitat fragmentation.
5. It would severely damage the setting of the National Park, the AONB generally
It would lose the distinctiveness of the settlements of Fishbourne and Bosham
6. There is no evidence (in the Document) to justify the proposed two form entry (420 number) primary school
7. There is no thought as to how to satisfactorily relieve present traffic issues, never mind future congestion and resultant diminution of air quality.
8. Generally speaking, we are altering the area in so many countless ways that very soon we will have a conurbation from Chichester to Portsmouth.