Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 1903

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Clare Schooling

Representation Summary:

Object to Loxwood allocation on the following grounds:
- Lack of sewage capacity
- Parts of village prone to flooding
- No viable public transport
- Lack of employment opportunities
- School at full capacity
- Lack of health facilities
- No consultation on development sites
- Unequal distribution of housing

Full text:

Re: The first consultation phase of the Chichester District Council Local Planed proposal to allocate a FURTHER 125 houses in Loxwood during 2019-2035.

I have genuine and considerable concerns about this proposal and would like to draw the following points to the the consideration of the council.

Sustainable development -
My understanding is that the National Planning Policy Framework (part 2) requires Local Plans to deliver sustainable development and if this cannot be proven then the plan will not be considered to be sound.
I am concerned that the criteria drawn up by the council to ascertain sustainability cannot be met by the proposal to allocate 125 more houses to Loxwood in the period 2019 to 2035.

Southern Water has confirmed the current sewerage system in Loxwood has no more capacity and yet they do not have any plans to update any infrastructure in their 2010 to 2015 spending plans. This means the new development on the Old Nursery, being constructed right now, has had to have holding tanks installed to cope with everyday sewerage. Surely this, alone, is not a sustainable way forward in terms of cost and the effect on the environment.
In addition, I am aware that parts of the village are already prone to both fluvial and surface water flooding.


There is no viable public transport available in the village, there are virtually no employment opportunities and the village primary school is close to full capacity so any new housing will force all residents to commute to work, travel to school and make everyday journeys by road, in private cars.

Local estate agents will confirm that most houses that are sold in the parish are bought by people from outside the area and not people moving within the village. Any local demand will be met by the current allocation of 60 houses within the current local plan.

These points, in my view, prove that Loxwood does not meet the council's own test of sustainability and therefore the Local Plan cannot be considered to be sound.

It would appear that the number of houses proposed has been driven by developers wishing to make a quick profit by proposing sites that are being promoted by local land owners, with disregard for the sustainability and suitability of development within our community.
No consultations have taken place at parish council level and no effort has been made to share the burden of housing across the neighbouring parishes. I believe this is contrary to national planning guidance that Chichester District Council is bound to follow when drafting a Local Plan, and which requires all district councils to carry out studies of potential housing sites and then consult with the parish council and residents.

I object to the proposal to allocate any further housing to Loxwood within the period 2019 to 2035, our infrastructure is stretched beyond capacity and without very significant investment into providing sustainable public transport, drainage/sewerage facilities, road network, job opportunities, education and health facilities the addition of such a number of new homes in our community is not viable.