Spatial Vision and Strategic Objectives
The objectives set out in paragraph 3.2 and further through 3.19 of the draft Local Plan are to be supported, but the plan should explain through subsequent sections, how these objectives are being achieved through the proposed policies. At present this is inferred rather than demonstrated through supplementary policy. The Estate suggests a more transparent link between policies and the delivery of the vision will provide a more robust position in the defence of inappropriate development. This could be achieved through cross-referencing policies to objectives.

The importance of policies protecting areas from inappropriate change should be given equal weight to policies promoting development. Leaving areas without a purpose (i.e. without a positive and demonstrable contribution to the vision) through no designation (unallocated), or a generality of policy (e.g. open countryside) leaves them vulnerable to inappropriate development proposals (in accordance with Policy S1).

Supporting paragraphs 3.3 - 3.16 are understandably general in nature, but additional focus of objectives, such as, for example:
* the identification of general areas to keep free of inappropriate development (e.g. between the city and National Park);
* describing the important features (including gaps, views, and built form) that make Chichester special;
* what is meant by a truly sustainable neighbourhood (not what a developer claims) and what is required to achieve it;
* what is meant by local distinctiveness, character and cohesion? Has evidence been provided to demonstrate what is meant by these terms and provide both developers and the community with a clear reference point?
* What is meant by 'careful management' in the protection of the relationship to the National Park? The relationship to the City should be included in paragraph 3.7.
* The stated emphasis of policy in the Manhood Peninsula will be misinterpreted to be totally resistant to new development, forcing need to be met in other areas and increasing the reliance on the car. The Estate believes there are sound opportunities within the Peninsular to provide new housing and employment sites in appropriate locations to support local economic opportunities and recommends that the Housing Provision figure (paragraph 4.24) should be increased.