I want to strongly object to the provisional allocation of 125 ADDITIONAL houses within Loxwood:

- We have already built/in process of building the 60 houses CDC wanted us to build - an additional 125 is extremely unfair.

- We are a very small village with limited facilities. What we do have is already at capacity - such as the school.

- The sewerage system is already beyond capacity with the houses we have now - raw waste floods people's gardens when it rains and the new development is not even allowed to connect directly to the network without over ground storage tanks. To then say you must have an additional 125 is not good.

- CDC Appear to have put houses where developers have put their land up - this is not the right approach. Sound planning principles and equitable distribution is absolutely necessary so impact is spread fairly in the area.

- Loxwood is not a sustainable area for public transport, with severely limited buses. No nearby train station etc.

Thanks,

Dan