Chichester Local Plan 2021-2039 - Main Modifications consultation

Search representations

Results for Historic England search

New search New search

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021-2039 - Main Modifications consultation

MM47

Representation ID: 6983

Received: 19/05/2025

Respondent: Historic England

Agent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

MM47 - We support the modifications to Policy P9 The Historic Environment which will clarify the purpose of the policy.

Full text:

Historic England

Chichester Local Plan Examination Main Modifications Consultation

Thank you for your email of 10 April 2025 inviting comments on the above consultation document.

As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.

There are many issues and matters in the Main Modifications consultation that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. Comments follow the order set out in the consultation document.

MM47 - We support the modifications to Policy P9 The Historic Environment which will clarify the purpose of the policy.

MM48 - we agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph relating to Scheduled Monuments, and the changes to the text of Policy P10 Listed Buildings to clarify the purpose and scope of the policy and include specific reference to Scheduled Monuments.

MM49 - we agree with the additional text to the supporting text of Policy P11 Conservation Areas, and support the revised wording of the policy.

MM50 - Policy P12 Non-Designated Heritage Assets: we agree wit the inclusion of a new paragraph describing the matters considered when dealing with non-designated assets, and support the changes to the wording of the policy that better reflect the NPPF.

MM51 - we support the revised and additional wording in Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens.

MM61 - we support the additional text in Policy E9 Caravan and Camping Sites in relation to its reference to "not compromising" historic environment designations in bullet point 6.

MM74 - we support the revision at bullet point 7 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A10 Land at Maudlin Farm.

MM77 - we support the revision at bullet point 14 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development.

We should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment. We hope that these comments are useful.

Attachments:

Comment

Chichester Local Plan 2021-2039 - Main Modifications consultation

MM48

Representation ID: 6984

Received: 19/05/2025

Respondent: Historic England

Agent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

MM48 - We agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph relating to Scheduled Monuments, and the changes to the text of Policy P10 Listed Buildings to clarify the purpose and scope of the policy and include specific reference to Scheduled Monuments.

Full text:

Historic England

Chichester Local Plan Examination Main Modifications Consultation

Thank you for your email of 10 April 2025 inviting comments on the above consultation document.

As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.

There are many issues and matters in the Main Modifications consultation that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. Comments follow the order set out in the consultation document.

MM47 - We support the modifications to Policy P9 The Historic Environment which will clarify the purpose of the policy.

MM48 - we agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph relating to Scheduled Monuments, and the changes to the text of Policy P10 Listed Buildings to clarify the purpose and scope of the policy and include specific reference to Scheduled Monuments.

MM49 - we agree with the additional text to the supporting text of Policy P11 Conservation Areas, and support the revised wording of the policy.

MM50 - Policy P12 Non-Designated Heritage Assets: we agree wit the inclusion of a new paragraph describing the matters considered when dealing with non-designated assets, and support the changes to the wording of the policy that better reflect the NPPF.

MM51 - we support the revised and additional wording in Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens.

MM61 - we support the additional text in Policy E9 Caravan and Camping Sites in relation to its reference to "not compromising" historic environment designations in bullet point 6.

MM74 - we support the revision at bullet point 7 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A10 Land at Maudlin Farm.

MM77 - we support the revision at bullet point 14 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development.

We should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment. We hope that these comments are useful.

Attachments:

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021-2039 - Main Modifications consultation

MM49

Representation ID: 6985

Received: 19/05/2025

Respondent: Historic England

Agent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

MM49 - We agree with the additional text to the supporting text of Policy P11 Conservation Areas, and support the revised wording of the policy.

Full text:

Historic England

Chichester Local Plan Examination Main Modifications Consultation

Thank you for your email of 10 April 2025 inviting comments on the above consultation document.

As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.

There are many issues and matters in the Main Modifications consultation that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. Comments follow the order set out in the consultation document.

MM47 - We support the modifications to Policy P9 The Historic Environment which will clarify the purpose of the policy.

MM48 - we agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph relating to Scheduled Monuments, and the changes to the text of Policy P10 Listed Buildings to clarify the purpose and scope of the policy and include specific reference to Scheduled Monuments.

MM49 - we agree with the additional text to the supporting text of Policy P11 Conservation Areas, and support the revised wording of the policy.

MM50 - Policy P12 Non-Designated Heritage Assets: we agree wit the inclusion of a new paragraph describing the matters considered when dealing with non-designated assets, and support the changes to the wording of the policy that better reflect the NPPF.

MM51 - we support the revised and additional wording in Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens.

MM61 - we support the additional text in Policy E9 Caravan and Camping Sites in relation to its reference to "not compromising" historic environment designations in bullet point 6.

MM74 - we support the revision at bullet point 7 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A10 Land at Maudlin Farm.

MM77 - we support the revision at bullet point 14 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development.

We should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment. We hope that these comments are useful.

Attachments:

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021-2039 - Main Modifications consultation

MM50

Representation ID: 6986

Received: 19/05/2025

Respondent: Historic England

Agent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

MM50 - Policy P12 Non-Designated Heritage Assets: we agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph describing the matters considered when dealing with non-designated heritage assets, and support the changes to the wording of the policy that better reflect the NPPF.

Full text:

Historic England

Chichester Local Plan Examination Main Modifications Consultation

Thank you for your email of 10 April 2025 inviting comments on the above consultation document.

As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.

There are many issues and matters in the Main Modifications consultation that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. Comments follow the order set out in the consultation document.

MM47 - We support the modifications to Policy P9 The Historic Environment which will clarify the purpose of the policy.

MM48 - we agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph relating to Scheduled Monuments, and the changes to the text of Policy P10 Listed Buildings to clarify the purpose and scope of the policy and include specific reference to Scheduled Monuments.

MM49 - we agree with the additional text to the supporting text of Policy P11 Conservation Areas, and support the revised wording of the policy.

MM50 - Policy P12 Non-Designated Heritage Assets: we agree wit the inclusion of a new paragraph describing the matters considered when dealing with non-designated assets, and support the changes to the wording of the policy that better reflect the NPPF.

MM51 - we support the revised and additional wording in Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens.

MM61 - we support the additional text in Policy E9 Caravan and Camping Sites in relation to its reference to "not compromising" historic environment designations in bullet point 6.

MM74 - we support the revision at bullet point 7 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A10 Land at Maudlin Farm.

MM77 - we support the revision at bullet point 14 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development.

We should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment. We hope that these comments are useful.

Attachments:

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021-2039 - Main Modifications consultation

MM51

Representation ID: 6987

Received: 19/05/2025

Respondent: Historic England

Agent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

MM51 - we support the revised and additional wording in Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens.

Full text:

Historic England

Chichester Local Plan Examination Main Modifications Consultation

Thank you for your email of 10 April 2025 inviting comments on the above consultation document.

As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.

There are many issues and matters in the Main Modifications consultation that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. Comments follow the order set out in the consultation document.

MM47 - We support the modifications to Policy P9 The Historic Environment which will clarify the purpose of the policy.

MM48 - we agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph relating to Scheduled Monuments, and the changes to the text of Policy P10 Listed Buildings to clarify the purpose and scope of the policy and include specific reference to Scheduled Monuments.

MM49 - we agree with the additional text to the supporting text of Policy P11 Conservation Areas, and support the revised wording of the policy.

MM50 - Policy P12 Non-Designated Heritage Assets: we agree wit the inclusion of a new paragraph describing the matters considered when dealing with non-designated assets, and support the changes to the wording of the policy that better reflect the NPPF.

MM51 - we support the revised and additional wording in Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens.

MM61 - we support the additional text in Policy E9 Caravan and Camping Sites in relation to its reference to "not compromising" historic environment designations in bullet point 6.

MM74 - we support the revision at bullet point 7 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A10 Land at Maudlin Farm.

MM77 - we support the revision at bullet point 14 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development.

We should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment. We hope that these comments are useful.

Attachments:

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021-2039 - Main Modifications consultation

MM61

Representation ID: 6988

Received: 19/05/2025

Respondent: Historic England

Agent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

MM61 - We support the additional text in Policy E9 Caravans and Camping Sites in relation to its reference to "not compromising" historic environment designations in bullet point 6.

Full text:

Historic England

Chichester Local Plan Examination Main Modifications Consultation

Thank you for your email of 10 April 2025 inviting comments on the above consultation document.

As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.

There are many issues and matters in the Main Modifications consultation that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. Comments follow the order set out in the consultation document.

MM47 - We support the modifications to Policy P9 The Historic Environment which will clarify the purpose of the policy.

MM48 - we agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph relating to Scheduled Monuments, and the changes to the text of Policy P10 Listed Buildings to clarify the purpose and scope of the policy and include specific reference to Scheduled Monuments.

MM49 - we agree with the additional text to the supporting text of Policy P11 Conservation Areas, and support the revised wording of the policy.

MM50 - Policy P12 Non-Designated Heritage Assets: we agree wit the inclusion of a new paragraph describing the matters considered when dealing with non-designated assets, and support the changes to the wording of the policy that better reflect the NPPF.

MM51 - we support the revised and additional wording in Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens.

MM61 - we support the additional text in Policy E9 Caravan and Camping Sites in relation to its reference to "not compromising" historic environment designations in bullet point 6.

MM74 - we support the revision at bullet point 7 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A10 Land at Maudlin Farm.

MM77 - we support the revision at bullet point 14 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development.

We should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment. We hope that these comments are useful.

Attachments:

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021-2039 - Main Modifications consultation

MM74

Representation ID: 6989

Received: 19/05/2025

Respondent: Historic England

Agent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

MM74 - we support the revision at bullet point 7 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A10 Land at Maudlin Farm.

Full text:

Historic England

Chichester Local Plan Examination Main Modifications Consultation

Thank you for your email of 10 April 2025 inviting comments on the above consultation document.

As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.

There are many issues and matters in the Main Modifications consultation that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. Comments follow the order set out in the consultation document.

MM47 - We support the modifications to Policy P9 The Historic Environment which will clarify the purpose of the policy.

MM48 - we agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph relating to Scheduled Monuments, and the changes to the text of Policy P10 Listed Buildings to clarify the purpose and scope of the policy and include specific reference to Scheduled Monuments.

MM49 - we agree with the additional text to the supporting text of Policy P11 Conservation Areas, and support the revised wording of the policy.

MM50 - Policy P12 Non-Designated Heritage Assets: we agree wit the inclusion of a new paragraph describing the matters considered when dealing with non-designated assets, and support the changes to the wording of the policy that better reflect the NPPF.

MM51 - we support the revised and additional wording in Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens.

MM61 - we support the additional text in Policy E9 Caravan and Camping Sites in relation to its reference to "not compromising" historic environment designations in bullet point 6.

MM74 - we support the revision at bullet point 7 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A10 Land at Maudlin Farm.

MM77 - we support the revision at bullet point 14 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development.

We should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment. We hope that these comments are useful.

Attachments:

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021-2039 - Main Modifications consultation

MM77

Representation ID: 6990

Received: 19/05/2025

Respondent: Historic England

Agent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

MM77 - we support the revision at bullet point 14 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development.

Full text:

Historic England

Chichester Local Plan Examination Main Modifications Consultation

Thank you for your email of 10 April 2025 inviting comments on the above consultation document.

As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.

There are many issues and matters in the Main Modifications consultation that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. Comments follow the order set out in the consultation document.

MM47 - We support the modifications to Policy P9 The Historic Environment which will clarify the purpose of the policy.

MM48 - we agree with the inclusion of a new paragraph relating to Scheduled Monuments, and the changes to the text of Policy P10 Listed Buildings to clarify the purpose and scope of the policy and include specific reference to Scheduled Monuments.

MM49 - we agree with the additional text to the supporting text of Policy P11 Conservation Areas, and support the revised wording of the policy.

MM50 - Policy P12 Non-Designated Heritage Assets: we agree wit the inclusion of a new paragraph describing the matters considered when dealing with non-designated assets, and support the changes to the wording of the policy that better reflect the NPPF.

MM51 - we support the revised and additional wording in Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens.

MM61 - we support the additional text in Policy E9 Caravan and Camping Sites in relation to its reference to "not compromising" historic environment designations in bullet point 6.

MM74 - we support the revision at bullet point 7 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A10 Land at Maudlin Farm.

MM77 - we support the revision at bullet point 14 to "Preserve the significance of heritage assets, having due regard to their settings" in Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development.

We should like to stress that this opinion is based on the information provided by the Council in its consultation. To avoid any doubt, this does not affect our obligation to provide further advice and, potentially, object to specific proposals which may subsequently arise where we consider that these would have an adverse effect upon the historic environment. We hope that these comments are useful.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.