Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Search representations

Results for Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team search

New search New search

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy AL6: Land South-West of Chichester (Apuldram and Donnington Parishes)

Representation ID: 1787

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

Any development South of A27 at Donnington/Apuldram/Fishbourne is at risk of flooding. It is on the Lavant flood plain

Full text:

Any development South of A27 at Donnington/Apuldram/Fishbourne is at risk of flooding. It is on the Lavant flood plain

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Strategic Wildlife Corridors

Representation ID: 1788

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

5.64
We support strategic wildlife corridors. However the one in Fishbourne has already been desecrated by Whitehouse Farm and development on Clay Lane. We propose a new one running from Chichester Harbour through Beth wins Farm to the South Downs. This will require planting and developing.

Full text:

5.64
We support strategic wildlife corridors. However the one in Fishbourne has already been desecrated by Whitehouse Farm and development on Clay Lane. We propose a new one running from Chichester Harbour through Beth wins Farm to the South Downs. This will require planting and developing.

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Wastewater

Representation ID: 1789

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

5.72
We support this. We do not support on site systems. We are opposed to any new connections to the Apuldram Waterworks.

Full text:

5.72
We support this. We do not support on site systems. We are opposed to any new connections to the Apuldram Waterworks.

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Southern Gateway

Representation ID: 1790

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

6.37 to 6.43 and AL5
We support this but feel it needs to be extended to include the railway and other buildings. It requires an extension to the station with an additional platform and line for a Metro service.
There needs to be a multi use building for concerts, conferences, exhibitions and community activity.

All waste water must be pumped to TANGMERE.
We need to include suitable housing for young people. Employment sites for entrepreneurs. A link to the gigabyte project.

Full text:

6.37 to 6.43 and AL5
We support this but feel it needs to be extended to include the railway and other buildings. It requires an extension to the station with an additional platform and line for a Metro service.
There needs to be a multi use building for concerts, conferences, exhibitions and community activity.

All waste water must be pumped to TANGMERE.
We need to include suitable housing for young people. Employment sites for entrepreneurs. A link to the gigabyte project.

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy AL5: Southern Gateway

Representation ID: 1792

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

Supported but should be extended to include railway and other buildings. An extension to the station is required with additional platform and line for a Metro service. Multi use building for concerts, conferences, exhibitions and community activity also neccesary. All waste water must be pumped to TANGMERE.
Include suitable housing for young people, employment sites for entrepreneurs and a link to the gigabyte project.

Full text:

6.37 to 6.43 and AL5
We support this but feel it needs to be extended to include the railway and other buildings. It requires an extension to the station with an additional platform and line for a Metro service.
There needs to be a multi use building for concerts, conferences, exhibitions and community activity.

All waste water must be pumped to TANGMERE.
We need to include suitable housing for young people. Employment sites for entrepreneurs. A link to the gigabyte project.

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy AL6: Land South-West of Chichester (Apuldram and Donnington Parishes)

Representation ID: 1793

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

Oppose any development here due to proximity to harbour

Full text:

6.44 to 6.49 Policy AL6
NOTE This is Apuldram/Donnington AND Fishbourne

Fishbourne Parish boundary is Lavant River

We oppose this. No development should be undertaken in this area. It is in the Lavant flood plain.
No additional housing
No Commercial sites
We object to the relief road.
All employment land MUST be relocated to the Goodwood Aerodrome site.
This site is too close to the AONB on a flood plain and the relief road would affect the landscape and views.
An additional road onto the Fishbourne Roundabout will add to the traffic being projected onto the roundabout with development in Southbourne, Chidham/Hambrook, Bosham and Fishbourne.

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy AL6: Land South-West of Chichester (Apuldram and Donnington Parishes)

Representation ID: 1794

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

6.44 to 6.49 Policy AL6

We oppose this. No development should be undertaken in this area. It is in the Lavant flood plain.
No additional housing
No Commercial sites
We object to the relief road.
All employment land MUST be relocated to the Goodwood Aerodrome site.
This site is too close to the AONB on a flood plain and the relief road would affect the landscape and views.
An additional road onto the Fishbourne Roundabout will add to the traffic being projected onto the roundabout with development in Southbourne, Chidham/Hambrook, Bosham and Fishbourne.

Full text:

6.44 to 6.49 Policy AL6
NOTE This is Apuldram/Donnington AND Fishbourne

Fishbourne Parish boundary is Lavant River

We oppose this. No development should be undertaken in this area. It is in the Lavant flood plain.
No additional housing
No Commercial sites
We object to the relief road.
All employment land MUST be relocated to the Goodwood Aerodrome site.
This site is too close to the AONB on a flood plain and the relief road would affect the landscape and views.
An additional road onto the Fishbourne Roundabout will add to the traffic being projected onto the roundabout with development in Southbourne, Chidham/Hambrook, Bosham and Fishbourne.

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Bosham

Representation ID: 1795

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

6.50 to 6.56 Policy AL7

This is a sensitive site close to the harbour and exposed. Any development must be supported by planting and screening.

If this site is developed we support the relocating of the school with sufficient parking.

Any development must include cycle routes and recreational space. We also recommend a new cricket pitch.

Out of choice we would not develop this site.

Full text:

6.50 to 6.56 Policy AL7

This is a sensitive site close to the harbour and exposed. Any development must be supported by planting and screening.

If this site is developed we support the relocating of the school with sufficient parking.

Any development must include cycle routes and recreational space. We also recommend a new cricket pitch.

Out of choice we would not develop this site.

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy AL7: Highgrove Farm, Bosham

Representation ID: 1796

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

6.50 to 6.56 Policy AL7

This is a sensitive site close to the harbour and exposed. Any development must be supported by planting and screening.

If this site is developed we support the relocating of the school with sufficient parking.

Any development must include cycle routes and recreational space. We also recommend a new cricket pitch.

Out of choice we would not develop this site.

Full text:

6.50 to 6.56 Policy AL7

This is a sensitive site close to the harbour and exposed. Any development must be supported by planting and screening.

If this site is developed we support the relocating of the school with sufficient parking.

Any development must include cycle routes and recreational space. We also recommend a new cricket pitch.

Out of choice we would not develop this site.

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Fishbourne

Representation ID: 1799

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

Too many houses, no sustainable sites

Full text:

6.62 to 6.65 Policy AL9

Fishbourne has had significant development in recent years. An additional 250 houses need to find a sustainable location. The area on Clay lane has now potentially been removed by the sudden imposition of a Wildlife Corridor. We support Wildlife Corridors but this one is in an area where development has already taken place and was being proposed by CDC.

Development on Bethwins Farm is hugely damaging to the village and encroaches on Bosham. It is not supported by the village. It removed important farm land and separates the Harbour from the South Downs. No other land has been identified as deliverable.
We propose that this 250 houses is reduced to a more manageable level in consultation with the Parish Council

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.