Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Search representations
Results for Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team search
New searchObject
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy AL6: Land South-West of Chichester (Apuldram and Donnington Parishes)
Representation ID: 1787
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
Any development South of A27 at Donnington/Apuldram/Fishbourne is at risk of flooding. It is on the Lavant flood plain
Any development South of A27 at Donnington/Apuldram/Fishbourne is at risk of flooding. It is on the Lavant flood plain
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Strategic Wildlife Corridors
Representation ID: 1788
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
5.64
We support strategic wildlife corridors. However the one in Fishbourne has already been desecrated by Whitehouse Farm and development on Clay Lane. We propose a new one running from Chichester Harbour through Beth wins Farm to the South Downs. This will require planting and developing.
5.64
We support strategic wildlife corridors. However the one in Fishbourne has already been desecrated by Whitehouse Farm and development on Clay Lane. We propose a new one running from Chichester Harbour through Beth wins Farm to the South Downs. This will require planting and developing.
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Wastewater
Representation ID: 1789
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
5.72
We support this. We do not support on site systems. We are opposed to any new connections to the Apuldram Waterworks.
5.72
We support this. We do not support on site systems. We are opposed to any new connections to the Apuldram Waterworks.
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Southern Gateway
Representation ID: 1790
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
6.37 to 6.43 and AL5
We support this but feel it needs to be extended to include the railway and other buildings. It requires an extension to the station with an additional platform and line for a Metro service.
There needs to be a multi use building for concerts, conferences, exhibitions and community activity.
All waste water must be pumped to TANGMERE.
We need to include suitable housing for young people. Employment sites for entrepreneurs. A link to the gigabyte project.
6.37 to 6.43 and AL5
We support this but feel it needs to be extended to include the railway and other buildings. It requires an extension to the station with an additional platform and line for a Metro service.
There needs to be a multi use building for concerts, conferences, exhibitions and community activity.
All waste water must be pumped to TANGMERE.
We need to include suitable housing for young people. Employment sites for entrepreneurs. A link to the gigabyte project.
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy AL5: Southern Gateway
Representation ID: 1792
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
Supported but should be extended to include railway and other buildings. An extension to the station is required with additional platform and line for a Metro service. Multi use building for concerts, conferences, exhibitions and community activity also neccesary. All waste water must be pumped to TANGMERE.
Include suitable housing for young people, employment sites for entrepreneurs and a link to the gigabyte project.
6.37 to 6.43 and AL5
We support this but feel it needs to be extended to include the railway and other buildings. It requires an extension to the station with an additional platform and line for a Metro service.
There needs to be a multi use building for concerts, conferences, exhibitions and community activity.
All waste water must be pumped to TANGMERE.
We need to include suitable housing for young people. Employment sites for entrepreneurs. A link to the gigabyte project.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy AL6: Land South-West of Chichester (Apuldram and Donnington Parishes)
Representation ID: 1793
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
Oppose any development here due to proximity to harbour
6.44 to 6.49 Policy AL6
NOTE This is Apuldram/Donnington AND Fishbourne
Fishbourne Parish boundary is Lavant River
We oppose this. No development should be undertaken in this area. It is in the Lavant flood plain.
No additional housing
No Commercial sites
We object to the relief road.
All employment land MUST be relocated to the Goodwood Aerodrome site.
This site is too close to the AONB on a flood plain and the relief road would affect the landscape and views.
An additional road onto the Fishbourne Roundabout will add to the traffic being projected onto the roundabout with development in Southbourne, Chidham/Hambrook, Bosham and Fishbourne.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy AL6: Land South-West of Chichester (Apuldram and Donnington Parishes)
Representation ID: 1794
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
6.44 to 6.49 Policy AL6
We oppose this. No development should be undertaken in this area. It is in the Lavant flood plain.
No additional housing
No Commercial sites
We object to the relief road.
All employment land MUST be relocated to the Goodwood Aerodrome site.
This site is too close to the AONB on a flood plain and the relief road would affect the landscape and views.
An additional road onto the Fishbourne Roundabout will add to the traffic being projected onto the roundabout with development in Southbourne, Chidham/Hambrook, Bosham and Fishbourne.
6.44 to 6.49 Policy AL6
NOTE This is Apuldram/Donnington AND Fishbourne
Fishbourne Parish boundary is Lavant River
We oppose this. No development should be undertaken in this area. It is in the Lavant flood plain.
No additional housing
No Commercial sites
We object to the relief road.
All employment land MUST be relocated to the Goodwood Aerodrome site.
This site is too close to the AONB on a flood plain and the relief road would affect the landscape and views.
An additional road onto the Fishbourne Roundabout will add to the traffic being projected onto the roundabout with development in Southbourne, Chidham/Hambrook, Bosham and Fishbourne.
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Bosham
Representation ID: 1795
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
6.50 to 6.56 Policy AL7
This is a sensitive site close to the harbour and exposed. Any development must be supported by planting and screening.
If this site is developed we support the relocating of the school with sufficient parking.
Any development must include cycle routes and recreational space. We also recommend a new cricket pitch.
Out of choice we would not develop this site.
6.50 to 6.56 Policy AL7
This is a sensitive site close to the harbour and exposed. Any development must be supported by planting and screening.
If this site is developed we support the relocating of the school with sufficient parking.
Any development must include cycle routes and recreational space. We also recommend a new cricket pitch.
Out of choice we would not develop this site.
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy AL7: Highgrove Farm, Bosham
Representation ID: 1796
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
6.50 to 6.56 Policy AL7
This is a sensitive site close to the harbour and exposed. Any development must be supported by planting and screening.
If this site is developed we support the relocating of the school with sufficient parking.
Any development must include cycle routes and recreational space. We also recommend a new cricket pitch.
Out of choice we would not develop this site.
6.50 to 6.56 Policy AL7
This is a sensitive site close to the harbour and exposed. Any development must be supported by planting and screening.
If this site is developed we support the relocating of the school with sufficient parking.
Any development must include cycle routes and recreational space. We also recommend a new cricket pitch.
Out of choice we would not develop this site.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Fishbourne
Representation ID: 1799
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
Too many houses, no sustainable sites
6.62 to 6.65 Policy AL9
Fishbourne has had significant development in recent years. An additional 250 houses need to find a sustainable location. The area on Clay lane has now potentially been removed by the sudden imposition of a Wildlife Corridor. We support Wildlife Corridors but this one is in an area where development has already taken place and was being proposed by CDC.
Development on Bethwins Farm is hugely damaging to the village and encroaches on Bosham. It is not supported by the village. It removed important farm land and separates the Harbour from the South Downs. No other land has been identified as deliverable.
We propose that this 250 houses is reduced to a more manageable level in consultation with the Parish Council