Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Search representations
Results for Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team search
New searchObject
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Addressing the Need for Retailing
Representation ID: 1720
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
4.6
We do need to retain and expand our retail offering This needs to be flexible as peoples requirements change. Young people now wish to live, work and play in Cities. Chichester currently does not offer this as a serious opportunity. This plan does little to address this.
4.62
We do not support the development of retail warehouse parks. This does damage to our city centre. We need to encourage the iconic stores into the City.
4.63
We support the enhancement of the local centres in Selsey, Wittering and Tangmere
4.6
We do need to retain and expand our retail offering This needs to be flexible as peoples requirements change. Young people now wish to live, work and play in Cities. Chichester currently does not offer this as a serious opportunity. This plan does little to address this.
4.62
We do not support the development of retail warehouse parks. This does damage to our city centre. We need to encourage the iconic stores into the City.
4.63
We support the enhancement of the local centres in Selsey, Wittering and Tangmere
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Addressing Horticultural Needs
Representation ID: 1723
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
4.75
Our view is that we could be doing more in this area. More thought is probably needed to help develop the area at a business level.
We believe there is scope for innovative horticulture especially in the Sidlesham and Almodington area.
4.75
Our view is that we could be doing more in this area. More thought is probably needed to help develop the area at a business level.
We believe there is scope for innovative horticulture especially in the Sidlesham and Almodington area.
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Providing Supporting Infrastructure and Services
Representation ID: 1724
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
4.8
No mention is made of supporting the Marine Industry within the confines of Chichester Harbour. This is essential and a new paragraph must be added. There is pressure on Northshore, Dell Quay and other smaller sites. The old Burnes site is left in ruin. This could be run as a successful business maybe with a few week-end retreats to help fund. All sites can thrive with clear policies by CDC. We must retain and encourage our marine industry. We lost Coombes many years ago due to CDC inability to support local business.
4.8
No mention is made of supporting the Marine Industry within the confines of Chichester Harbour. This is essential and a new paragraph must be added. There is pressure on Northshore, Dell Quay and other smaller sites. The old Burnes site is left in ruin. This could be run as a successful business maybe with a few week-end retreats to help fund. All sites can thrive with clear policies by CDC. We must retain and encourage our marine industry. We lost Coombes many years ago due to CDC inability to support local business.
4.86
This is not acceptable as a clause. Infrastructure is critical. We cannot build if the roads, water or mains drainage is insufficient.
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S13: Chichester City Development Principles
Representation ID: 1730
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
This area (Southern Gateway) must be fully redeveloped with Hotel, Multi use centre for exhibitions, concerts and conferences with a site for community use. An area must also be created for young business leaders with gigabyte connectivity. Space should also be found for the University to incubate businesses. Housing should focus on young people wishing to live in the city.
4.88
The decision to develop along the East West corridor is short sighted and damaging to the area and will not enhance the villages. The infrastructure is not present. It will develop land too close to the AONB and create a housing corridor.
4.92
This area must be fully redeveloped with Hotel, Multi use centre for exhibitions, concerts and conferences with a site for community use. An area must also be created for young business leaders with gigabyte connectivity. Space should also be found for the University to incubate businesses. Housing should focus on young people wishing to live in the city.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S14: Chichester City Transport Strategy
Representation ID: 1731
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
4.98
We have read the Transport Study. The costings appear to be incorrect. We do not accept this study.
4.98
We have read the Transport Study. The costings appear to be incorrect. We do not accept this study.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S15: Goodwood Motor Circuit and Airfield
Representation ID: 1733
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
4.108 to 4.11
Policy S15/S16
This area should be used for additional commercial development. It is close to Rolls Royce and the roads can be improved to accommodate new high grade businesses. The building can be built to avoid concern over noise from the airfield and motor circuit.
This site could take some if not all of the proposed building from the site at AL6
4.108 to 4.11
Policy S15/S16
This area should be used for additional commercial development. It is close to Rolls Royce and the roads can be improved to accommodate new high grade businesses. The building can be built to avoid concern over noise from the airfield and motor circuit.
This site could take some if not all of the proposed building from the site at AL6
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S16: Development within vicinity of Goodwood Motor Circuit and Airfield
Representation ID: 1736
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
4.108 to 4.11
Policy S15/S16
This area should be used for additional commercial development. It is close to Rolls Royce and the roads can be improved to accommodate new high grade businesses. The building can be built to avoid concern over noise from the airfield and motor circuit.
This site could take some if not all of the proposed building from the site at AL6
4.108 to 4.11
Policy S15/S16
This area should be used for additional commercial development. It is close to Rolls Royce and the roads can be improved to accommodate new high grade businesses. The building can be built to avoid concern over noise from the airfield and motor circuit.
This site could take some if not all of the proposed building from the site at AL6
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Transport Infrastructure
Representation ID: 1749
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
5.15
The plan provides insufficient detail for the provision of cycle routes on all new developments. Cycle routes should be part of the agreed outline and not set down later. All new developments MUST have dedicated cycle routes that link in with existing routes on the highways.
5.19
We believe the level of housing proposed along the a259 will cause major holdups at the Fishbourne roundabout. This will be damaging to business, tourism and the local population.
5.15
The plan provides insufficient detail for the provision of cycle routes on all new developments. Cycle routes should be part of the agreed outline and not set down later. All new developments MUST have dedicated cycle routes that link in with existing routes on the highways.
5.19
We believe the level of housing proposed along the a259 will cause major holdups at the Fishbourne roundabout. This will be damaging to business, tourism and the local population.
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Countryside and Countryside Gaps
Representation ID: 1755
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
5.34 to 5.43
Countryside gaps need to be defined urgently and guaranteed to be in place for at least 25 years. If not they will be valid for only till the next 5 year Review.......
5.34 to 5.43
Countryside gaps need to be defined urgently and guaranteed to be in place for at least 25 years. If not they will be valid for only till the next 5 year Review.......
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Natural Environment
Representation ID: 1785
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
5.53
Most of the land proposed for development along the A259 corridor is Grade 1, 2 or 3a land. It is required for growing food and keeping livestock.
5.53
Most of the land proposed for development along the A259 corridor is Grade 1, 2 or 3a land. It is required for growing food and keeping livestock.
