Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Search representations
Results for Domusea search
New searchSupport
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S2: Settlement Hierarchy
Representation ID: 3309
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: Domusea
Agent: Genesis Town Planning
We agree that Southbourne is properly classified as a settlement hub in the hierarchy background paper being the 3rd largest settlement behind Chichester & Selsey in terms of population and having 26 total facilities.
We agree that North Mundham/Runcton is properly classified as a service village in the hierarchy.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S4: Meeting Housing Needs
Representation ID: 3313
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: Domusea
Agent: Genesis Town Planning
Whilst we understand the need assessment was carried out in accordance with standard method set out in PPG we suggest it has potential flaws as 435dpa in adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just National Park.
Out of the total 12,350 dwellings, 4,400 or 35% are proposed as new strategic allocations. Given this significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead in times for housing delivery we suggest the plan includes a trajectory for them especially as this would better comply with Paragraph 73 of the NPPF2.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S5: Parish Housing Requirements 2016-2035
Representation ID: 3318
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: Domusea
Agent: Genesis Town Planning
Promoting site at Pigeon House Farm, North Mundham with access from B2166 Lagness Road which has capacity for 125 dwellings.
Unequal distribution of housing between Hunston and North Mundham/Runcton.
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S12: Infrastructure Provision
Representation ID: 3321
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: Domusea
Agent: Genesis Town Planning
Support Policy but should add in the following:
Southbourne - Paragraph 15.4 of the IDP should in addition state that 'the parish is allocated for residential development of 1250 dwellings' rather than 'the site is...' in recognition that more than 1 location might be selected for the allocation.
Mundham -
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy AL13: Southbourne Parish
Representation ID: 3336
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: Domusea
Agent: Genesis Town Planning
Support the allocation of land for a minimum of 1250 dwellings at Southbourne Parish.
3 promoted sites at 139 Wayside, Main Road, Southbourne (10 dwellings capacity), Land adjacent to Newton, Inlands Road, Southbourne (65 capacity) and land at Gordon Road, Southbourne (30 dwelling capacity). Combined with other larger sites as part of a dispersed strategy, they could contribute to housing supply in the early part of the plan period with the larger sites with longer lead in times coming later.
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Development Strategy
Representation ID: 3432
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: Domusea
Agent: Genesis Town Planning
Promoting sites at:
Pigeon House Farm, North Mundham
Wayside, Main Road, Nutbourne
Inlands Road, Southbourne
Land south of Gordon Road, Southbourne
See attachment