Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Search representations
Results for North Mundham Parish Council search
New searchObject
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Strategic Wildlife Corridors
Representation ID: 1263
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: North Mundham Parish Council
5.66 The wildlife corridor identified on Map 5.2 does not recognise Pagham Rife which is a key wildlife area of flood plain and reed beds penetrating northwards into North Mundham Parish. Ignoring this major migratory zone poses a threat to the integrity of the Pagham SPA.
5.66 The wildlife corridor identified on Map 5.2 does not recognise Pagham Rife which is a key wildlife area of flood plain and reed beds penetrating northwards into North Mundham Parish. Ignoring this major migratory zone poses a threat to the integrity of the Pagham SPA.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S31: Wastewater Management and Water Quality
Representation ID: 1264
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: North Mundham Parish Council
Policy should include the large industrial scale horticultural developments which are located within the Chichester and Pagham Harbour Treatment Catchment areas. This includes the Runcton HDA and Selsey were high levels of nitrates and other pollutants may leach into watercourses.
The large industrial scale horticultural developments which are located within the Chichester and Pagham Harbour Treatment Catchment areas. This includes the Runcton HDA and Selsey were high levels of nitrates and other pollutants may leach into watercourses.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy S32: Design Strategies for Strategic and Major Development Sites
Representation ID: 1265
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: North Mundham Parish Council
Existing settlements area at risk of losing their existing identity and meaning with villages turning into sizeable towns.
Existing settlements area at risk of losing their existing identity and meaning with villages turning into sizeable towns.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Hunston
Representation ID: 1266
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: North Mundham Parish Council
Paragraph 6.77 includes the specific matters to be taken into account including "protecting existing views and particularly those of Chichester Cathedral spire and Hunston Copse" and also notes "Particular regard should be made to the designated Site of Nature Conservation Interest and Ancient Woodland known as Hunston Copse". Yet there is no mention of these points in Policy AL11 which specifies the requirements to be taken into account when accessing plans for development.
Paragraph 6.77 includes the specific matters to be taken into account including "protecting existing views and particularly those of Chichester Cathedral spire and Hunston Copse" and also notes "Particular regard should be made to the designated Site of Nature Conservation Interest and Ancient Woodland known as Hunston Copse". Yet there is no mention of these points in Policy AL11 which specifies the requirements to be taken into account when accessing plans for development.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Policy AL12: Land North of Park Farm, Selsey
Representation ID: 1268
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: North Mundham Parish Council
The planned development would be immediately adjacent to the Pagham Harbour SPA and Ramsar site. Policy item 9 requires mitigation to ensure protection but the damage in terms of loss of agricultural land buffer is highly likely to outweigh any possible mitigation and would be contrary to policy S27 - loss of high-quality agricultural land.
The planned development would be immediately adjacent to the Pagham Harbour SPA and Ramsar site. Policy item 9 requires mitigation to ensure protection but the damage in terms of loss of agricultural land buffer is highly likely to outweigh any possible mitigation and would be contrary to policy S27 - loss of high-quality agricultural land.
