Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Search representations

Results for Chichester Harbour Conservancy search

New search New search

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy DM18: Flood Risk and Water Management

Representation ID: 3110

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

It would be helpful to include the sequential test here.

"Appropriate flood warning and evacuation plans may be required to ensure that any additional risks relevant to development have been considered."

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Chichester Harbour Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)

Representation ID: 3111

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

Page 172, 7.119 Chichester Harbour AONB:
The wording of 7.119 could be improved.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Chichester Harbour Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)

Representation ID: 3112

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

Page 172, 7.120 Chichester Harbour AONB:
"Applicants are encouraged to seek pre-application advice from Chichester Harbour Conservancy for proposed development including intertidal structures, reclamation and dredging, increases in the resident fleet or moorings and dry berth transfers."

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy DM19: Chichester Harbour Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)

Representation ID: 3113

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

a) The Conservancy notes the deletion of certain words from the existing Local Plan compared to what is proposed:

Existing Local Plan

"Planning permission will be granted where it can be demonstrated that all the following criteria have been met:"

Proposed Local Plan

"Planning permission will be granted where it can be demonstrated:"

b) The Conservancy strongly supports the inclusion of point 3, but notes it conflicts with some of the wider housing allocation policies.

c) "5. The development is consistent with the policy aims of the Chichester Harbour AONB Management Plan and Joint Chichester Harbour AONB SPD."

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy DM21: Alterations, Change of Use and/or Re-use of Exisiting Buildings in the Countryside

Representation ID: 3114

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

The policy wording could be strengthened.

"Development will need to ensure it is sensitive to its surroundings, respect the landscape setting and character of the locality. Sites within or adjoining the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty will need to demonstrate that the design and scale of the proposal is in keeping with the special designation."

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Historic Environment

Representation ID: 3115

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

Page 186, 7.162 Historic Environment:
Chichester Harbour has a rich historic environment. It is a shame this is not recognised on the list of four locally distinctive character areas. Meanwhile, the National Park is mentioned on three of the four areas, for some reason, despite being outside the scope of the Local Plan area.

Such is the lack of recognition of the historic environment and heritage assets of Chichester Harbour, the Conservancy considered objecting to this policy, but eventually resolved to issue comments and allow Chichester District Council to remedy the oversight.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Natural Environment

Representation ID: 3116

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

Chichester Harbour is the largest natural harbour in South East England. The Local Plan should specify setting of Chichester Harbour AONB.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy DM29: Biodiversity

Representation ID: 3117

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

Chichester Harbour has an extensive network of biodiversity which is nationally and internationally important. Yet there is no mention of Chichester Harbour in this policy. Chichester District Council are also advised that a developer in Chidham cleared a site of all trees before submitting a planning application (17/03626/OUT). This practice completely undermines the policy.

The LPA should undertake a biodiversity audit to form a baseline and monitor developments against this policy to demonstrate the net gains in biodiversity required by the NPPF.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy DM31: Trees, Hedgerows and Woodlands

Representation ID: 3118

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

Under point 1, to change "existing valued trees" to "existing valued and statutorily protected trees".

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy DM33: Canals

Representation ID: 3119

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Representation Summary:

To note that the Chichester Ship Canal is an existing wildlife corridor with a high recreational value.

Full text:

See attachment

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.