Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Comment

Representation ID: 3090

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Page 116, 6.65:
Given that Chichester Harbour is part of Fishbourne and the South Downs is 2 kilometres away, in terms of the sentence structure protecting the views and setting of Chichester Harbour AONB should come before the South Downs National Park.

Object

Representation ID: 3091

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Object on the following grounds:
* Major development on the fringe of the AONB.
* Affect buffer zone outside the AONB.
* Breach of current and emerging AONB Management Plan
* SSSI Interest Impact Risk Zone, which affects the SAC, SPA and Ramsar designations.
*Wildlife
* Views
* Highest quality agricultural land
* Urbanisation
* Light, air, noise, and soil pollution.
* Wastewater
* Inadequate mitigation

Comment

Representation ID: 3092

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Page 118, 6.70 Chidham & Hambrook:
Given that Chichester Harbour is part of Chidham, in terms of the sentence structure protecting the views and setting of Chichester Harbour should come before the South Downs.

Object

Representation ID: 3093

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Object on the following grounds:
* Major development on the fringe of the AONB.
* Affect buffer zone outside the AONB.
* Breach of current and emerging AONB Management Plan
* SSSI Interest Impact Risk Zone, which affects the SAC, SPA and Ramsar designations.
* Wildlife
* Views
* Highest quality agricultural land
* Urbanisation
* Light, air, noise, and soil pollution.
* Wastewater
* Inadequate mitigation

Comment

Representation ID: 3094

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Page 127-8, 6.90 Southbourne:
The Conservancy is unsure what "creating opportunities for new views" means. There is a concern this means replacing rural views with urban views or building upwards to stand-out from the landscape.

Object

Representation ID: 3095

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Object on the following grounds:
- Major development on the fringe of the AONB.
- Affect buffer zone outside the AONB.
- Breach of current and emerging AONB Management Plan
- SSSI Interest Impact Risk Zone, which affects the SAC, SPA and Ramsar designations.
- Wildlife
- Views
- Highest quality agricultural land
- Urbanisation
- Light, air, noise, and soil pollution.
- Wastewater
- Inadequate mitigation

Comment

Representation ID: 3096

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

There is no mention of affordability.

Comment

Representation ID: 3097

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

The first word of the policy, "All" contradicts the NPPF (2018).

Comment

Representation ID: 3098

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

There is not a rationale as to why Chichester District Council generally consider 35 dwellings per hectare as appropriate.

Comment

Representation ID: 3099

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Page 141, 7.34 Affordable Housing Exception Sites:
The term "exceptional circumstances" is too vague.