Draft A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Version 2 - May 2024
Search representations
Results for Linden Downland Graylingwell LLP – c/o Vistry Southern search
New searchObject
Draft A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) Version 2 - May 2024
1.0 Introduction
Representation ID: 6564
Received: 11/07/2024
Respondent: Linden Downland Graylingwell LLP – c/o Vistry Southern
Agent: Andrew Burgess Planning Ltd
• Improvements to the A27 should not be the sole responsibility of housebuilders.
• A proper justification to exclude other uses from contributions has still not been provided. A few token lines have been added
• We are still in the current Local Plan period which did not suggest that 700 dpa would not have an unacceptable highway impact.
• The emerging Local Plan is the correct process for introducing the need for additional contributions towards the A27 where the evidence can be properly assessed and considered. The SPD is prematurely introducing these contributions in the interim
• CIL Test conflict as set out in the November 2023 representations has not been resolved.
The SPD should be withdrawn and the issues considered as part of the Local Plan Examination.
These representations should be read in conjunction with representation ID: 6379 submitted in November 2023 on behalf of Linden Downland Graylingwell LLP – c/o Countryside Partnerships.
The revised SPD does not address the previous representations in full and raises new issues. The key concerns are,
• Improvements to the A27 should not be the sole responsibility of housebuilders.
• A proper justification to exclude other uses from contributions has still not been provided.
• The current Local Plan is still in force and does not suggest that 700 dwellings per annum would have an unacceptable highway impact.
• The emerging Local Plan is the correct process for introducing the need for additional contributions towards the A27, where the evidence can be properly assessed and considered. The SPD is prematurely introducing these contributions in the interim.
• The draft SPD remains in conflict with the Community Infrastructure Levy tests and the conflicts set out in the original November 2023 representations and the original have not been resolved.
Please can you give very careful consideration to these representations as part of the further consideration of the draft SPD.
