A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
Search representations
Results for Fishbourne Parish Council search
New searchComment
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
Introduction
Representation ID: 6326
Received: 01/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
1.2 add to final sentence "and on the villages along its feeder lanes and villages."
1.2 add to final sentence "and on the villages along its feeder lanes and villages."
Comment
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
Purpose, Scope and Status of this Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 6337
Received: 17/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
1.3 Add at the end "including the impact where the cumulative impact is at its greatest and the unintended impact on the country lanes whch are not designed for the volume of traffic that will use them as diversions."
1.3 Add at the end "including the impact where the cumulative impact is at its greatest and the unintended impact on the country lanes whch are not designed for the volume of traffic that will use them as diversions."
Comment
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
The 2016 Planning Obligations & Affordable Housing SPD
Representation ID: 6338
Received: 17/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
2.3 Given the over capacity of the road use, and the fact that all Fishbourne's facilities and services are fully stretched, this document needs to go further than Policy 9 and remove "where appropriate"
2.6 We are very concerned about the shortfall in funding as a result of inflation and lack of support from HM Government.
2.3 Given the over capacity of the road use, and the fact that all Fishbourne's facilities and services are fully stretched, this document needs to go further than Policy 9 and remove "where appropriate"
2.6 We are very concerned about the shortfall in funding as a result of inflation and lack of support from HM Government.
Comment
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
Background
Representation ID: 6339
Received: 17/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
2.3 (last sentence). The qualifying phrase ("where appropriate") not only weakens the statement but also opens up scope for differing legal interpretations if an application goes to appeal. If there to be any cass where mitigation would not be required, a set of criteria would be helpful.
2.3 (last sentence). The qualifying phrase ("where appropriate") not only weakens the statement but also opens up scope for differing legal interpretations if an application goes to appeal. If there to be any cass where mitigation would not be required, a set of criteria would be helpful.
Support
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
Introduction
Representation ID: 6340
Received: 17/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
Support 1.2 that 2016 SPD was no longer sufficient to address the impact that the new developments would have collectively on the Chichester Ring Road and its feeder roads and lanes. However, the provision in 2016 was already inadequate - hence the problems set out in detail in the Parish Council's report: "The Cumulative Impact of Increased Housing Development Surrounding the Parish of Fishbourne, Chichester 2022" (attached)
It seems a strange logic that suggests the solution to over-crowding is to substantially increase the volume!
Support 1.2 that 2016 SPD was no longer sufficient to address the impact that the new developments would have collectively on the Chichesr Ring Road and it feeder roads and lanes. However, the provision in 2016 was aleady inadequate - hence the problems set out in detail in the Parish Council's report: "The Cumulative Impact of Increased Housing Development Surrounding the Parish of Fishbourne, Chichester 2022" (attached)
It seems a strange logic that suggests the solution to over-crowding is to substantially increase the volume!
Comment
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
Updated technical evidence
Representation ID: 6341
Received: 17/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
2.6 & 2.7 We are concerned by the funding shortfall. This must not lead to a situation where building is permitted on the promise/hope of funding for road infrastructure at a later stage.
2.11 We are also very concerned that it is considered acceptable to "try to provide" rather than actually indicate how "additional trips .... through sustainable transport measures" would be achieved. Further that it is proposed to make "other small-scale local highway network interventions" when it has been clear for many years and identified in 2016 that only major work for the Fishbourne roundabout will be credible.
2.6 & 2.7 We are concerned by the funding shortfall. This must not lead to a situation where building is permitted on the promise/hope of funding for road infrastructure at a later stage.
2.11 We are also very concerned that it is considered acceptable to "try to provide" rather than actually indicate how "additional trips .... through sustainable transport measures" would be achieved. Further that it is proposed to make "other small-scale local highway network interventions" when it has been clear for many years and identified in 2016 that only major work for the Fishbourne roundabout will be credible.
Comment
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
The need for a revised approach to securing planning obligations
Representation ID: 6342
Received: 17/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
We welcome the lower level of development as part of the "infrastructure constrained approach" as a result of the lack of government funding for an A27 northern or southern bypass but until this is provided there cannot be a proper resolution of the problem. We would like to see more recognition of the destructive nature of excessive cumulative impact on the quality of life of existing residents as formulated in national and local policies.
We welcome the lower level of development as part of the "infrastructure constrained approach" as a result of the lack of government funding for an A27 northern or southern bypass but until this is provided there cannot be a proper resolution of the problem. We would like to see more recognition of the destructive nature of excessive cumulative impact on the quality of life of existing residents as formulated in national and local policies.
Comment
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
National Policy and Guidance
Representation ID: 6343
Received: 17/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
3.4 If the funding available through CIL is not sufficient to fund the required A27 mitigations, then the message needs to go back to Government that the system that will ultimately provide them with the right houses in the right place is one that recognises that the data used in making their calculations is in need of urgent review
3.4 If the funding available through CIL is not sufficient to fund the required A27 mitigations, then the message needs to go back to Government that the system that will ultimately provide them with the right houses in the right place is one that recognises that the data used in making their calculations is in need of urgent review
Comment
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
Local Planning Policy
Representation ID: 6344
Received: 17/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
We support Policies 8 and 9 of the Local Planning Policy with the reservations that:
Policy 8: in this year's Village Survey, VOLUME of traffic was the top concern and this will really only be resolved in Fishbourne by the separation of local and through traffic.
Policy 9: the local provision of services and facilities (e.g. doctors' surgery, local shops) would have the additional benefit of reducing the amount of travel by Fishbourne residents.
We support Policies 8 and 9 of the Local Planning Policy with the reservations that:
Policy 8: in this year's Village Survey, VOLUME of traffic was the top concern and this will really only be resolved in Fishbourne by the separation of local and through traffic.
Policy 9: the local provision of services and facilities (e.g. doctors' surgery, local shops) would have the additional benefit of reducing the amount of travel by Fishbourne residents.
Comment
A27 Chichester Bypass Mitigation Supplementary Planning Document - August 2023
The cost of the infrastructure works
Representation ID: 6345
Received: 17/10/2023
Respondent: Fishbourne Parish Council
4.4 - Fishbourne Roundabout with the Terminus Road Link (cost between £9.5 and £12.9 million) - FPC are concerned that this proposal will make no impact on the traffic onto and off the A259 and will have very little impact in the traffic management on the roundabout per se. If this is all the housing mitigation measures planned for this roundabout, they fall woefully short of effective or efficient.
4.5 While it is true that costs will change overtime, it is still important to have maximum costs and both intentional and unintentional consequences taken into account when evaluating a pollcy.
4.4 - Fishbourne Roundabout with the Terminus Road Link (cost between £9.5 and £12.9 million) - FPC are concerned that this proposal will make no impact on the traffic onto and off the A259 and will have very little impact in the traffic management on the roundabout per se. If this is all the housing mitigation measures planned for this roundabout, they fall woefully short of effective or efficient.
4.5 While it is true that costs will change overtime, it is still important to have maximum costs and both intentional and unintentional consequences taken into account when evaluating a pollcy.
