Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Search representations
Results for Mr AJ Renouf, Mr DA Renouf, & Mrs SJ Renouf search
New searchObject
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Policy H1 Meeting Housing Needs
Representation ID: 5422
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: Mr AJ Renouf, Mr DA Renouf, & Mrs SJ Renouf
Agent: Rodway Planning Consultancy Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Draft Plan does not meet the District’s own LHN and there is no allowance to meet the unmet housing need of the South Downs National Park or the coastal sub-region.
There is no meaningful or reliable buffer included, and no account has been taken of the potential for the non-implementation of strategic and allocated sites, or for accommodating unmet need from adjoining constrained authorities. The Standard Method is a minimum starting point as advocated by the NPPG. We would suggest that a 10% buffer be applied to be accounted for within the Draft Plan. We contend that this is the minimum required in order to ensure the new Local Plan is delivering sufficiently over the Plan period in order to meet identified housing needs.
Currently, in terms of meeting housing needs, we must conclude that the Draft Plan is unsound.
It lacks adequate flexibility, and it misses the opportunity to meet the unmet housing needs of adjacent, more constrained Authorities.
We would suggest that a 10% buffer be applied to be accounted for within the Draft Plan.
See attached.
Conclusion
In light of all the above we contend that Sites HOV0006 (Sherwood Nursery) and HOV0012 (Landsdowne Nursery) should be reconsidered for allocation for housing development in the Draft Plan. The Sites are positively assessed in the HELAA, and are situated adjacent to existing consented and planned allocated sites. This area is clearly suitable for new housing. The Sites are previously developed and provide an opportunity for new housing in a sustainable location, without encroaching onto greenfield land. In this context the natural next step would be to add the Sites to the draft Plan as additional site allocations for residential development.
We put these two sites forward with the intention to provide high quality housing in an area with an identified need. We have made it clear in the above representations that the Sites are eminently available, sustainably located and can provide much needed new residential units.
The District Council’s proposed housing figures for the Plan period are considered to be insufficient to meet the needs of the District when the significant unmet needs of adjacent and other nearby authorities are taken into account.
In this context, the broad location of Shopwhyke (east of Chichester) is acknowledged as being a sustainable location in the context of Chichester District, and we consider that it should be aiming to provide an increased housing figure during the Plan period.
The Sites are unconstrained by any landscape or other planning designations. The work that has been undertaken, and the conclusions of which clearly identify that the Sites are suitable for development.
We contend that Sherwood Nursery should be removed from the Strategic Wildlife Corridor designation for the reasons we have set out.
In its current form, we contend that the Draft Plan does not meet soundness tests insofar that it does not positively contribute to the achievement of sustainable development, and nor does it comply with the strategic policies of the area, by failing to provide a sufficient quantum of housing.
The justification for not meeting the housing needs in full is set out in the Housing Need and Transport Background Papers (May 2024). The latest Duty to Cooperate evidence is set out in the updated Statement of Compliance.
The latest projected supply position is set out in the Housing Supply Background Paper (May 2024), which currently shows a total supply of 10,752, a buffer that amounts to approximately 4% which strikes a balance between ensuring a robust supply position while recognising the constrained housing requirement
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Policy H2 Strategic Locations/ Allocations 2021 - 2039
Representation ID: 5426
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: Mr AJ Renouf, Mr DA Renouf, & Mrs SJ Renouf
Agent: Rodway Planning Consultancy Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Sites submitted. Lansdowne Nursery Oving, 48 dwellings. Sherwood Nursery Oving 15 dwellings.
Allocate submitted sites.
See attached.
Conclusion
In light of all the above we contend that Sites HOV0006 (Sherwood Nursery) and HOV0012 (Landsdowne Nursery) should be reconsidered for allocation for housing development in the Draft Plan. The Sites are positively assessed in the HELAA, and are situated adjacent to existing consented and planned allocated sites. This area is clearly suitable for new housing. The Sites are previously developed and provide an opportunity for new housing in a sustainable location, without encroaching onto greenfield land. In this context the natural next step would be to add the Sites to the draft Plan as additional site allocations for residential development.
We put these two sites forward with the intention to provide high quality housing in an area with an identified need. We have made it clear in the above representations that the Sites are eminently available, sustainably located and can provide much needed new residential units.
The District Council’s proposed housing figures for the Plan period are considered to be insufficient to meet the needs of the District when the significant unmet needs of adjacent and other nearby authorities are taken into account.
In this context, the broad location of Shopwhyke (east of Chichester) is acknowledged as being a sustainable location in the context of Chichester District, and we consider that it should be aiming to provide an increased housing figure during the Plan period.
The Sites are unconstrained by any landscape or other planning designations. The work that has been undertaken, and the conclusions of which clearly identify that the Sites are suitable for development.
We contend that Sherwood Nursery should be removed from the Strategic Wildlife Corridor designation for the reasons we have set out.
In its current form, we contend that the Draft Plan does not meet soundness tests insofar that it does not positively contribute to the achievement of sustainable development, and nor does it comply with the strategic policies of the area, by failing to provide a sufficient quantum of housing.
The justification for not meeting the housing needs in full is set out in the Housing Need and Transport Background Papers (May 2024).
The justification and evidence to support the latest housing trajectory is set out in the Housing Supply Background Paper (May 2024).
Promotion of site noted.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Policy NE4 Strategic Wildlife Corridors
Representation ID: 5427
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: Mr AJ Renouf, Mr DA Renouf, & Mrs SJ Renouf
Agent: Rodway Planning Consultancy Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Wildlife corridor should be amended to not include land within submitted site of Sherwood Nursery.
Amend wildlife corridor.
See attached.
Conclusion
In light of all the above we contend that Sites HOV0006 (Sherwood Nursery) and HOV0012 (Landsdowne Nursery) should be reconsidered for allocation for housing development in the Draft Plan. The Sites are positively assessed in the HELAA, and are situated adjacent to existing consented and planned allocated sites. This area is clearly suitable for new housing. The Sites are previously developed and provide an opportunity for new housing in a sustainable location, without encroaching onto greenfield land. In this context the natural next step would be to add the Sites to the draft Plan as additional site allocations for residential development.
We put these two sites forward with the intention to provide high quality housing in an area with an identified need. We have made it clear in the above representations that the Sites are eminently available, sustainably located and can provide much needed new residential units.
The District Council’s proposed housing figures for the Plan period are considered to be insufficient to meet the needs of the District when the significant unmet needs of adjacent and other nearby authorities are taken into account.
In this context, the broad location of Shopwhyke (east of Chichester) is acknowledged as being a sustainable location in the context of Chichester District, and we consider that it should be aiming to provide an increased housing figure during the Plan period.
The Sites are unconstrained by any landscape or other planning designations. The work that has been undertaken, and the conclusions of which clearly identify that the Sites are suitable for development.
We contend that Sherwood Nursery should be removed from the Strategic Wildlife Corridor designation for the reasons we have set out.
In its current form, we contend that the Draft Plan does not meet soundness tests insofar that it does not positively contribute to the achievement of sustainable development, and nor does it comply with the strategic policies of the area, by failing to provide a sufficient quantum of housing.
Comment noted. The Strategic Wildlife Corridors Background Paper sets out the justification for the inclusion of land within the corridors. It is considered that this land should remain within the corridor, as the evidence indicates the presence of a bat movement network (including commuting, foraging and feeding) in this part of the corridor.
