Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Search representations

Results for Tanglewood Residences Limited search

New search New search

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Policy H1 Meeting Housing Needs

Representation ID: 4552

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Tanglewood Residences Limited

Agent: Andrew Black Consulting

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

It is not considered that the Council has justified the extent of the under supply of housing against the established housing need. There are significant concerns over the delivery of housing from the strategic allocations within the unjustified timescales as set out within the trajectory contained in the plan.

Full text:

See attached representation.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Policy H2 Strategic Locations/ Allocations 2021 - 2039

Representation ID: 5974

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Tanglewood Residences Limited

Agent: Andrew Black Consulting

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

It is considered that the anticipated delivery from these allocations is highly ambitious and lacks any justification from CDC given that planning permission is still required and the lead in time to delivery is generally longer for strategic sites of this size.

Full text:

See attached representation.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Policy H3 Non-Strategic Parish Housing Requirements 2021 - 2039

Representation ID: 5975

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Tanglewood Residences Limited

Agent: Andrew Black Consulting

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The overall strategy as set out by CDC in the plan is highly dependent on the delivery of housing from Neighbourhood Plan areas. Whilst this approach is not un-sound in itself, it is considered that the plan in its current form allows for little mitigation or alternatives should delivery not come forward in the neighbourhood plan areas. It is considered that in order to be ‘effective’ and ‘positively prepared’ the Local Plan should also allocate the sites in Wisborough Green as stand-alone applications with an allowance that applications could come forward on these sites in the event that the
Neighbourhood Plans do not progress

Change suggested by respondent:

In order for the plan to be considered ‘positively prepared’ and ‘justified’ it is recommended that additional wording is added to policy H3 to state that individual planning applications can come forward on sustainable sites outside of existing settlement boundaries in parishes should delivery not come forward within the first 2 years of the plan period. Priority should be given to any sites already identified within draft versions of Neighbourhood Plans. This is inclusive of the proposed Tanglewood Nursery site at Wisborough Green.

Full text:

See attached representation.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Policy A13 Southbourne Broad Location for Development

Representation ID: 6253

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Tanglewood Residences Limited

Agent: Andrew Black Consulting

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is not considered that the SA has considered adequate reasonable alternatives to growth at Southbourne which would include allocation of sites elsewhere in the village including within the AONB that can deliver in the early part of the plan period.

Full text:

See attached representation.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.