Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Search representations
Results for RADAR search
New searchObject
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
6.48
Representation ID: 3799
Received: 17/02/2023
Respondent: RADAR
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality.
A clear distinction between the Residential areas of the City Centre. Zoning of Bar/Club night time economy should be sought for the protection of the Conservation Area and Residents.
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently.
(Address can be supplied, if requested but withheld for Legal reasons) Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality.
The Historic City should already be protected by the CDC but the Planning Department have not implemented or enforced policies with any effect or Confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to the Cathedral and Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents and RISK.
Objection and comments noted. Paragraph 6.48 provides justification for the effective maintenance of the historic environment but is not specific to Chichester City. The proposed segregation of city centre uses is considered unlikely to be justified on grounds of harm to the significance of the broad historic environment. Changes to the plan in this respect are therefore considered disproportionate. Impacts relating to residential amenity are beyond the scope of this policy (objections have also been recorded against P6 – amenity – rep 6307 refers).
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
6.53
Representation ID: 3800
Received: 17/02/2023
Respondent: RADAR
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality. City should be protected by the CDC but Planning Department who have not implemented/enforced policies with any effect/Confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to Cathedral/Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents and RISK.
A clear distinction between the Residential areas of the City Centre.
Zoning of Bar/Club night time economy (south Street) should be sought for the protection of the Conservation Area and Residents.
Listed buildings in residential areas should not be used for amplified music venues.
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently.(withheld for Legal reasons) Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality. City should be protected by the CDC but Planning Department who have not implemented/enforced policies with any effect/Confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to Cathedral/Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents and RISK.
Objection and comments noted. The issue raised appears to be focused on how different uses in the city centre need to be managed rather than the heritage matters which form the basis of this policy. Consequently, the point raised is considered to be beyond the scope of the policy and instead needs to be addressed by another mechanism such as licensing. In addition, the changes made to the use classes order by the Government mean that it is now much more difficult to direct evening uses to particular locations.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
6.64
Representation ID: 3801
Received: 17/02/2023
Respondent: RADAR
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality. While change of use is necessary for the good of the City. Implementation of Planning enforcement should be adhered to.
A clear distinction between the Residential areas of the City Centre.
Zoning of bar and night time economy should be sought for the protection of the Conservation Area and Residents.
Listed buildings in residential areas should not be used for amplified music venues
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. ( Address can be supplied, if requested but withheld for Legal reasons) Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality. While change of use is necessary for the good of the City. Implementation of Planning enforcement should be adhered to.
The Historic City should already be protected by the CDC but the Planning Department have not implemented or enforced policies with any effect or Confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to the Cathedral and Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents at RISK.
Listed buildings in residential areas should not be used for amplified music venues.
The Church of Rome & The Church Of England now have a stricter Policy and ethos in place of encouraging community usage for their deconsecrate churches and buildings.
Objection and comments noted. Paragraph 6.64 recognises the need for change of use proposals to be accompanied by full information about associated impacts, such as sound attenuation and for any extant harms to be fully justified as necessary for delivering optimum viable use. Furthermore, Policy P10 states that CDC will support proposals for alternative uses which do not have an adverse impact on the character and appearance of the building and where the change will provide for its long-term conservation, which is considered to proportionately address the issue. The proposed segregation of city centre uses is considered unlikely to be justified on grounds of harm to the historic character, qualities and special interest of listed buildings. Changes to the plan in this respect are therefore considered disproportionate. Impacts relating to residential amenity are beyond the scope of this policy (objections have also been recorded against P6 – amenity – rep 6307 refers).
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
6.102
Representation ID: 3802
Received: 17/02/2023
Respondent: RADAR
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality. The residents well-being has been affected by the CDC lack of action. What confidence will an Inspector have that this again be adhered to.
A clear distinction between the Residential areas of the City Centre. Zoning of Bar/Club night time economy should be sought for the protection of the Conservation Area and Residents.
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. ( Address can be supplied, if requested but withheld for Legal reasons) Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality. The residents well-wellbing has been affected by the CDC lack of action. What confidence will an Inspector have that this again be adhered to.
The Historic City should already be protected by the CDC but the Planning Department have not implemented or enforced policies with any effect or confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to the Cathedral and Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents and RISK.
Listed buildings in residential areas should not be used for amplified music venues.
Residents well-being should be put foremost. The ineffectiveness of implementation of planning policy affects this.
Comments noted
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
7.48
Representation ID: 3803
Received: 17/02/2023
Respondent: RADAR
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality.
A clear distinction between the Residential areas of the City Centre.
Zoning of Bar and night time economy should be sought.
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. ( Address can be supplied, if requested but withheld for Legal reasons) Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality.
The Historic City should already be protected by the CDC but the Planning Department have not implemented or enforced policies with any effect or Confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to the Cathedral and Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents at RISK.
Listed buildings in residential areas should not be used for amplified music venues.
The Church of Rome & The Church Of England now have a stricter Policy and ethos in place of encouraging community usage for their deconsecrate churches and buildings.
Comment noted
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
10.4
Representation ID: 3804
Received: 17/02/2023
Respondent: RADAR
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality.
A clear distinction between the Residential areas within the City Centre.
Zoning of Bar and night time economy should be sought.
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently. (Address withheld for Legal reasons) Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality.
A clear distinction between the residential areas within the city centre is sought. Zoning og bar and night time economy should be sought, for the protection of the Conservation Area and Residents.
Listed buildings in residential areas should not be used as amplified music venues whatsoever.
The Historic City should protected take into account the sensitivity/character of the area of the Cathedral,Boarding School and the Conservation Area and Residents.
.
The Church of Rome & The Church Of England now have a stricter Policy and ethos in place of encouraging community usage for their deconsecrate churches and buildings
Comment noted. The proposed segregation of city centre uses is considered unlikely to be justified on grounds of harm to the significance of the broad historic environment. Changes to the plan in this respect are therefore considered disproportionate at this time.
The policy includes wording relating to the requirement to have regard to the Conservation Area and the need to support development proposals with historic characterisation assessments and heritage impact assessments.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Policy P11 Conservation Areas
Representation ID: 3809
Received: 17/02/2023
Respondent: RADAR
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
City should be protected by the CDC but Planning Department who have not implemented/enforced policies with any effect/Confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to Cathedral/Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents and RISK
A clear distinction between the Residential areas of the City Centre. Zoning of Bar/Club night time economy (south Street) should be sought for the protection of the Conservation Area and Residents.
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently.(withheld for Legal reasons) Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality. City should be protected by the CDC but Planning Department who have not implemented/enforced policies with any effect/Confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to Cathedral/Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents and RISK.
Objection and comments noted. Policy P11 is focused on preserving or enhancing the character or appearance of conservation areas. The proposed segregation of city centre uses is considered unlikely to be justified on grounds of harm to the aesthetic characteristics of the conservation area. Changes to the plan in this respect are therefore considered disproportionate. Impacts relating to residential amenity are beyond the scope of this policy (objections have also been recorded against P6 – amenity – rep 6307 refers).
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Policy P6 Amenity
Representation ID: 6307
Received: 17/02/2023
Respondent: RADAR
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently.
(Address can be supplied, if requested but withheld for Legal reasons) Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality.
The Historic City should already be protected by the CDC but the Planning Department have not implemented or enforced policies with any effect or Confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to the Cathedral and Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents and RISK.
A clear distinction between the Residential areas of the City Centre. Zoning of Bar/Club night time economy should be sought for the protection of the Conservation Area and Residents
RADAR objects to this on the grounds of Soundness. CDC has a dismal track record on Planning Enforcement. What confidence can any Inspector have that the CDC will implement or enforce proposed Policies given what has happened at a Premises in West Street recently.
(Address can be supplied, if requested but withheld for Legal reasons) Past performance undermines the Soundness of the Plan and possibly the Legality.
The Historic City should already be protected by the CDC but the Planning Department have not implemented or enforced policies with any effect or Confidence nor taken account of the sensitivity of the area next to the Cathedral and Boarding School and has left the Conservation Area and Residents and RISK.
Objection and proposed change noted. Policy P6 ensures proposals for development including change of use does not result in unacceptable impacts on the amenity of an area or its users, including residents and occupiers. The proposed imposition of zoning within the city centre is therefore considered disproportionate and unjustified.
