Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Support

Representation ID: 4581

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports this policy.

Support Noted.

Support

Representation ID: 4582

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green. Already built new development in rural NE parishes, neighbouring Billingshurst and WG has led to a shortfall or worsening of provision.
The Infrastructure Development Plan is Chichester centric. How will the lack of provision in the northern parishes be addressed?

Support noted

Support

Representation ID: 4584

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

This comment relates to P16 but omitted from P16 response. Relates to points 3 and 4.
WGPC supports the policy intent but this cannot be applied to Wisborough Green.
This is, again, a Chichester centric policy; it ignores the exigencies and impracticability of creating a cycling network and pedestrian routes on/adjacent to overcrowded and busy minor roads.
This fails to promote a healthy lifestyle or address the inadequacies of the lack of public transport.
This is not practical for the north-east parishes

Support noted

Support

Representation ID: 4585

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports the intent but this cannot be applied to Wisborough Green.
The policy qualifiers are not realistic about the challenges of a rural parish

Support noted.

Support

Representation ID: 4586

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green. This policy is Chichester-centric; Wisborough Green residents have no option other than to rely upon private cars.

It is acknowledged that a key focus of Policy T1 is addressing the issues raised by the impact of traffic in the south of the plan area on the A27. However, the Local Plan as a whole does acknowledge the particular issues of the plan area’s more rural communities such as Wisborough Green.

Support

Representation ID: 4588

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green. This policy is Chichester-centric; WG residents have no option other than to rely upon private cars.

Noted.

Support

Representation ID: 4589

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports this policy.

Support noted

Support

Representation ID: 4590

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green. Please refer to our response to Policy H3 which details the parish's infrastructure concerns.

Support noted.

Support

Representation ID: 4592

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green.

The background text applies to the Local Plan area including Wisborough Green.

For specific strategic infrastructure requirements for Wisborough Green please see IDP under plan area requirements sections

For infrastructure that is related to thresholds such as open space, Wisborough Green Neighbourhood Plan could ensure that infrastructure is maximised by identifying one larger site for its housing number rather than scattering development thinly.

Support

Representation ID: 4593

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green, a village that relies upon private cars.

It is acknowledged that a key focus of Policy T1 is addressing the issues raised by the impact of traffic in the south of the plan area on the A27. However, the Local Plan as a whole does acknowledge the particular issues of the plan area’s more rural communities such as Wisborough Green.