Planning for Health and Wellbeing

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 696

Received: 31/01/2019

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Horn

Representation Summary:

Much more needs to be included to encourage healthy living such as all facilities being within walking distance.

Full text:

Much more needs to be included to encourage healthy living such as all facilities being within walking distance.

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 950

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Pieter Montyn

Representation Summary:

5.9 to 5.11 and Policy S21 should include that proposals that worsen conditions or detract from the aims will be unacceptable

Full text:

5.9 to 5.11 and Policy S21 should include that proposals that worsen conditions or detract from the aims will be unacceptable

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 1800

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Anna Khoo

Representation Summary:

Dementia care provision through care homes or other safe green spaces should be considered as part of wellbeing planning. Need for such services is expected to increase and communities should not be left without adequate provision for want of a specific policy - there is no specific planning policy protecting or necessitating dementia care facilities and this has caused issues in the past.

Full text:

Dementia care provision will need to increase and should considered in planning (see West Sussex's representations on the Whyke Lodge care home planning application 17/01712/FUL - objection dated 26 Jul 2017)
The district council refused the application to convert the care home into flats but lacked a specific planning policy to refer to when trying to protect dementia care provision and care for the elderly as a community facility/asset.
The appeal resolved in the council's favour but it may help to have a more specific planning policy included in some form to ensure communities are not left without such facilities.
It has also been noted that gardens or open meadow spaces can be beneficial for those with dementia. Perhaps more secure green spaces where people with dementia can relax attached to healthcare buildings or other safe spaces without worries about getting lost could be considered in planning public open space.

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 2350

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: West Sussex Local Access Forum (WSLAF)

Representation Summary:

Para 5.9 - this objective is supported but should encourage all NMU activity not limited to walking and cycling.

Full text:

Para 3.2 bullet points 5, 9 & 10 - these objectives are supported
The Local Plan Strategic Objectives
Para 3.19 Health & Well-Being bullet point 1 - this objective is supported
Policy S18 Integrated Coastal Zone Management for the Manhood Peninsula : Objective 5 - while the objective is supported it should apply to all Non-Motorised User (NMU) activity. This could best be achieved by ensuring at least one multi-user route is provided around and through developments linked to the existing Public Right of Way (PRoW) and wider access networks.
Design : Policy 20 bullet point 5 - the objective is supported but should recognise that this includes multi-use PRoW for the use and benefit of all.
Planning for Health and Well-being Para 5.9 - this objective is supported but should encourage all NMU activity not limited to walking and cycling.
Transport Infrastructure
Para 5.15 - the inclusion of bridleways is welcomed but there should be specific inclusion of PRoW
Para 5.16 - the wording is misleading as the provision of bridleways on the Coastal Plain is very limited, restricting access for cyclists and equestrians. Upgrading suitable PRoW to bridleways would improve access for all NMUs and contribute to the West Sussex Transport Plan (2011-2016) to improve safety for all road users.
Policy S23 : Transport and Accessibility bullet point 8 - inclusion of PRoW is welcomed
Policy S32: Design Strategies for Strategic and Major Development Sites
Bullet points b, e & g - the aims of these are welcomed but any new routes are linked from new developments to the wider PRoW and access networks
Policy AL1 : Land West of Chichester
Para 4 - this development provides an opportunity to improve access links to the wider access network
Para 10 - there is an opportunity here to provide a multi-user PRoW for all NMUs
Policy AL2: Land at Shopwyke (Oving Parish)
Para 9 - any bridge should be for all NMUs, including equestrians, to reinstate the route severed when the A27 was re-aligned.
Policies AL3 - AL14 - opportunities for the provision of green infrastructure links to the wider countryside within these Policies are welcomed. It is particularly relevant to the Coastal Plain where the current provision of multi-user routes is very limited. Improvements in this area would comply with the objectives of the West Sussex Rights of Way Management Pan 2018-2028.

DM15 Horticultural Development - there is an opportunity within the Runcton area to enhance and upgrade routes for NMUs should the land be used for housing at a later date.
Policy DM23 Green Infrastructure
Para 7.185 - the examples should specifically include PRoW.
Bullet point 4 - more positive wording to recognise the improvement proposals could make to the access networks is preferred.
Policy DM34 Open Space, Sport and Recreation.... - the aim to retain, enhance, enhance access and increase the quantity and quality of PROW and the links to them is supported. This would be of great benefit to all NMUs is all new routes/links are multi-user.

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 3136

Received: 04/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Sharp

Representation Summary:

Insert as last paragraph Safe, segregated cycle facilities that enable children from the age of 8 up to elderly residents of 80 should be included.


Quote Mayor of Bogata.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments: