5.10

Object

Representation ID: 4184

Received: 15/03/2023

Respondent: Chidham and Hambrook Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Housing developments of any size should be counted against parish allocations. There is no justification for not doing so.

Support

Representation ID: 4526

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

WGPC supports this statement with qualification
In a rural village with limited land availability, developments of fewer than 6 dwellings should count towards allocated housing totals; developments of this size are more easily integrated into a village.
It is essential to delegate to the NP process the ability to make minor amendments to the H3 policy numbers.

Object

Representation ID: 5840

Received: 17/03/2023

Respondent: Kirdford Parish Council

Agent: Troy Planning + Design

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Text should clarify process/mechanism for “some flexibility for minor amendments to housing numbers for individual parishes”; what is meant by ‘flexibility’ and ‘minor amendments’? Does this text mean to say ‘neighbourhood areas’ rather than ‘individual parishes’?
Disagree with text that proposes development of less than 6 dwellings not counting against ‘parish housing requirement’ due to these already being taken into account as windfall allowance from small sites - see attachment for reasoning; Paragraph contravenes NPPF Paragraph 70 which states that neighbourhood planning groups should consider opportunities for small and medium sites rather than reject them as CDC is suggesting;