3.22
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 3770
Received: 06/02/2023
Respondent: Mrs ALISON REDFORD
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Increasing Loxwood's housing by a further 220, on top of substantial building in recent years, would not be conserving the rural character of this area. Why should all the housing be dumped in the North? Our village facilities have decreased since September 2022 with the closure of the village stores and post office.
This should not be to the detriment of the current village character in Loxwood.
Increasing Loxwood's housing by a further 220, on top of substantial building in recent years, would not be conserving the rural character of this area. Why should all the housing be dumped in the North? Our village facilities have decreased since September 2022 with the closure of the village stores and post office.
Support
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 4619
Received: 16/03/2023
Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council
However, the statement of fact and the key conclusion lacks adequate specification - WG lacks ‘Landscape Capacity’.
The LP Review includes the Landscape Capacity Study that includes the NE Parishes. The assessment for WG correctly determines the sensitivity to be High and the Capacity for development is Low; specific conclusions assert that there is limited scope for development outside the existing Settlement Area. The report gives a clear indication that high scale growth would be a loss of important rural landscape and countryside; whilst defining ‘high scale’ could be subjective, development that adds double-digit inflation of housing numbers should qualify.
However, the statement of fact and the key conclusion lacks adequate specification - WG lacks ‘Landscape Capacity’.
The LP Review includes the Landscape Capacity Study that includes the NE Parishes. The assessment for WG correctly determines the sensitivity to be High and the Capacity for development is Low; specific conclusions assert that there is limited scope for development outside the existing Settlement Area. The report gives a clear indication that high scale growth would be a loss of important rural landscape and countryside; whilst defining ‘high scale’ could be subjective, development that adds double-digit inflation of housing numbers should qualify.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5815
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: Kirdford Parish Council
Agent: Troy Planning + Design
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
Justification provided by CDC for the selected Spatial Strategy in relation to the North of the Plan Area (NAP) is difficult to follow and it fails to effectively justify CDC’s decision to look to Kirdford for additional housing. It states that “Conserving the rural character of the area, with its high quality landscape and environment is a key objective” yet this is not the actual Strategic Objective of the Local Plan, therefore what exactly is the Local Plan referring to here? Do not see where there is an "identified need" set out in evidence for additional housing need in Kirdford.
See attachment.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6232
Received: 16/03/2023
Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
However, the statement of fact and the key conclusion lacks adequate specification - WG lacks ‘Landscape Capacity’. The LP Review includes the Landscape Capacity Study that includes the NE Parishes. The assessment for WG correctly determines the sensitivity to be High and the Capacity for development is Low; specific conclusions assert that there is limited scope for development outside the existing Settlement Area. The report gives a clear indication that high scale growth would be a loss of important rural landscape and countryside; whilst defining ‘high scale’ could be subjective, development that adds double-digit inflation of housing numbers should qualify.
However, the statement of fact and the key conclusion lacks adequate specification - WG lacks ‘Landscape Capacity’.
The LP Review includes the Landscape Capacity Study that includes the NE Parishes. The assessment for WG correctly determines the sensitivity to be High and the Capacity for development is Low; specific conclusions assert that there is limited scope for development outside the existing Settlement Area. The report gives a clear indication that high scale growth would be a loss of important rural landscape and countryside; whilst defining ‘high scale’ could be subjective, development that adds double-digit inflation of housing numbers should qualify.