3.18

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 3984

Received: 10/03/2023

Respondent: Elizabeth Lawrence Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

These settlements are very small and the proposed allocations will simply place more reliance on car use and congestion along the A27

Change suggested by respondent:

These allocations should be removed and more reliance should be placed on settlement hubs outside Chichester.

Full text:

These settlements are very small and the proposed allocations will simply place more reliance on car use and congestion along the A27

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 3993

Received: 10/03/2023

Respondent: Mrs Jane Towers

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Neither Hambrook, Nutbourne or Bosham are capable of accomodating growth of 600. The expansion of these villages is not matched by an increase in infrastructure. They are no more capable of it than Fishbourne, with just as many constraints.

Change suggested by respondent:

Reduce the number of housing in these A259 corridor villages.

Full text:

Neither Hambrook, Nutbourne or Bosham are capable of accomodating growth of 600. The expansion of these villages is not matched by an increase in infrastructure. They are no more capable of it than Fishbourne, with just as many constraints.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4160

Received: 15/03/2023

Respondent: Chidham and Hambrook Parish Council

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Nutbourne and Hambrook do not function as one service village. Along with Bosham this area is not capable of accommodating growth of this magnitude. All sites available have severe restrictions which have not been taken into account; they are on good quality agricultural land,, in wildlife corridors or within the setting of the AONB. To build this large scale housing will be contrary to many other policies. To build such large scale housing it will be contrary to many other policies.

Change suggested by respondent:

A reclarification of Nutbourne and Hambrook as a genuinely poorly served service village.
Reduce the allocated housing for Bosham and Nutbourne and Hambrook commensurate with Fishbourne.

Full text:

Nutbourne and Hambrook do not function as one service village. Along with Bosham this area is not capable of accommodating growth of this magnitude. All sites available have severe restrictions which have not been taken into account; they are on good quality agricultural land,, in wildlife corridors or within the setting of the AONB. To build this large scale housing will be contrary to many other policies. To build such large scale housing it will be contrary to many other policies.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4334

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Chichester Harbour Conservancy

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

"Land at Highgrove Farm, east of Broadbridge, Bosham is allocated in the Site Allocation DPD 2014 - 2029 for 50 dwellings." This planning application has lapsed. Shouldn't the allocation of 50 dwellings be deleted, to be replaced by a proposed allocation for 295 dwellings?

Change suggested by respondent:

Policy A11 to allocate 295 dwellings to Bosham - as much as I disagree with the Policy, let's at least make sure we're talking about the same thing here.

Full text:

"Land at Highgrove Farm, east of Broadbridge, Bosham is allocated in the Site Allocation DPD 2014 - 2029 for 50 dwellings." This planning application has lapsed. Shouldn't the allocation of 50 dwellings be deleted, to be replaced by a proposed allocation for 295 dwellings?

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4343

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Mr Stephen Jupp

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Nutbourne and Hambrook is highly sustainable with a very good bus service and having a train station.
Previous analysis demonstrated it could accommodate 500 dwellings and the figure has been reduced to 300 SOLELY due to local political pressure - this is not a sound approach when the council is trying to argue a reduced housing figure

Change suggested by respondent:

increase allocation in Nutbourne and Hambrook to 500

Full text:

Nutbourne and Hambrook is highly sustainable with a very good bus service and having a train station.
Previous analysis demonstrated it could accommodate 500 dwellings and the figure has been reduced to 300 SOLELY due to local political pressure - this is not a sound approach when the council is trying to argue a reduced housing figure

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4927

Received: 17/03/2023

Respondent: Willowfield Farm

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

I object to the allocation of all of the houses to one site in Bosham. The reasons to justify this decision appear to conflict with the NPPF and other adopted policies.

Change suggested by respondent:

25-30 units should be allocated to HBO0003

Full text:

I object to the allocation of all of the houses to one site in Bosham. The reasons to justify thsi decisions appear to conflict with the NPPF and other adopted policies.