2.50
Support
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 4419
Received: 16/03/2023
Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council
Support – WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green.
This statement is in direct conflict with 2.27. Services in WG cannot be improved without having a detrimental impact upon the rural character and historic environment.
Support – WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green.
This statement is in direct conflict with 2.27. Services in WG cannot be improved without having a detrimental impact upon the rural character and historic environment.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 4460
Received: 16/03/2023
Respondent: Plaistow and Ifold Parish Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The Council has some concerns about the implications of ‘enhancement’ of local services and facilities. Enhancement is normally required to cope with greater numbers of people. If the primary emphasis in the North of the Plan Area is to maintain “the rural character of the existing villages, whilst enabling the local communities to become more self-reliant in meeting their local needs…” then tighter drafting is required to ensure that all development in the area is driven by evidenced existing local need – rather than a potential ‘local need’ once development has been delivered.
Suggest tighter drafting is required to ensure that all development in the area is driven by evidenced existing local need – rather than a potential ‘local need’ once development has been delivered.
The Council supports the main messages as drafted; however, it has some concerns about the implications of ‘enhancement’ of local services and facilities.
Enhancement is normally required to enable existing modest services and facilities – which support local need only - to cope with greater numbers of people. As drafted, this part of the Plan offers the potential for confusing and conflicting decision making.
If the primary emphasis in the North of the Plan Area is to maintain “the rural character of the existing villages, whilst enabling the local communities to become more self-reliant in meeting their local needs…” then tighter drafting is required to ensure that all development in the area is driven by evidenced existing local need – rather than a potential ‘local need’ once development has been delivered.
Support
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6143
Received: 16/03/2023
Respondent: Plaistow and Ifold Parish Council
Support in principle
The Council supports the main messages as drafted; however, it has some concerns about the implications of ‘enhancement’ of local services and facilities.
Enhancement is normally required to enable existing modest services and facilities – which support local need only - to cope with greater numbers of people. As drafted, this part of the Plan offers the potential for confusing and conflicting decision making.
If the primary emphasis in the North of the Plan Area is to maintain “the rural character of the existing villages, whilst enabling the local communities to become more self-reliant in meeting their local needs…” then tighter drafting is required to ensure that all development in the area is driven by evidenced existing local need – rather than a potential ‘local need’ once development has been delivered.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6201
Received: 16/03/2023
Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Support – WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green.
This statement is in direct conflict with 2.27. Services in WG cannot be improved without having a detrimental impact upon the rural character and historic environment.
Support – WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green.
This statement is in direct conflict with 2.27. Services in WG cannot be improved without having a detrimental impact upon the rural character and historic environment.