2.50

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4419

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support – WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green.
This statement is in direct conflict with 2.27. Services in WG cannot be improved without having a detrimental impact upon the rural character and historic environment.

Full text:

Support – WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green.
This statement is in direct conflict with 2.27. Services in WG cannot be improved without having a detrimental impact upon the rural character and historic environment.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4460

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Plaistow and Ifold Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The Council has some concerns about the implications of ‘enhancement’ of local services and facilities. Enhancement is normally required to cope with greater numbers of people. If the primary emphasis in the North of the Plan Area is to maintain “the rural character of the existing villages, whilst enabling the local communities to become more self-reliant in meeting their local needs…” then tighter drafting is required to ensure that all development in the area is driven by evidenced existing local need – rather than a potential ‘local need’ once development has been delivered.

Change suggested by respondent:

Suggest tighter drafting is required to ensure that all development in the area is driven by evidenced existing local need – rather than a potential ‘local need’ once development has been delivered.

Full text:

The Council supports the main messages as drafted; however, it has some concerns about the implications of ‘enhancement’ of local services and facilities.

Enhancement is normally required to enable existing modest services and facilities – which support local need only - to cope with greater numbers of people. As drafted, this part of the Plan offers the potential for confusing and conflicting decision making.

If the primary emphasis in the North of the Plan Area is to maintain “the rural character of the existing villages, whilst enabling the local communities to become more self-reliant in meeting their local needs…” then tighter drafting is required to ensure that all development in the area is driven by evidenced existing local need – rather than a potential ‘local need’ once development has been delivered.

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6143

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Plaistow and Ifold Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Support in principle

Full text:

The Council supports the main messages as drafted; however, it has some concerns about the implications of ‘enhancement’ of local services and facilities.

Enhancement is normally required to enable existing modest services and facilities – which support local need only - to cope with greater numbers of people. As drafted, this part of the Plan offers the potential for confusing and conflicting decision making.

If the primary emphasis in the North of the Plan Area is to maintain “the rural character of the existing villages, whilst enabling the local communities to become more self-reliant in meeting their local needs…” then tighter drafting is required to ensure that all development in the area is driven by evidenced existing local need – rather than a potential ‘local need’ once development has been delivered.

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6201

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Support – WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green.
This statement is in direct conflict with 2.27. Services in WG cannot be improved without having a detrimental impact upon the rural character and historic environment.

Full text:

Support – WGPC supports this approach but questions how it could be applied to Wisborough Green.
This statement is in direct conflict with 2.27. Services in WG cannot be improved without having a detrimental impact upon the rural character and historic environment.