Settlement Hierachy
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 298
Received: 25/01/2019
Respondent: Mr Carey Mackinnon
Settlement Hierarchy. Para 4.12
Your definition says that services and features included Medical Facilities and Public Transport but says nothing about their adequacy.
Yes there is an excellent modern Medical Facility but it is already oversubscribed with many times a week being impossible to make an appointment. That's before the existing houses under construction are occupied let alone building any new ones.
Yes there is public transport but at certain times it is quicker to walk from Chichester to Birdham - actual documented event in 2018
Settlement Hierarchy. Para 4.12
Your definition says that services and features included Medical Facilities and Public Transport but says nothing about their adequacy.
Yes there is an excellent modern Medical Facility but it is already oversubscribed with many times a week being impossible to make an appointment. That's before the existing houses under construction are occupied let alone building any new ones.
Yes there is public transport but at certain times it is quicker to walk from Chichester to Birdham - actual documented event in 2018
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 1243
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: North Mundham Parish Council
It is not clear how may of the 'services and facilities' are required to designate an area as a 'Service Village'
It is not clear how may of the 'services and facilities' are required to designate an area as a 'Service Village'
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 1603
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team
4.8/4.9
This plan does not enhance or maintain the vitality of some of the rural communities. More development in Fishbourne, Donnington, Chidham, Hambrook and Bosham will damage the communities. Other more rural communities do need more housing to ensure the shops and schools survive. Funtington and East and West Ashling are good examples.
4.8/4.9
This plan does not enhance or maintain the vitality of some of the rural communities. More development in Fishbourne, Donnington, Chidham, Hambrook and Bosham will damage the communities. Other more rural communities do need more housing to ensure the shops and schools survive. Funtington and East and West Ashling are good examples.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 2844
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: MR William Sharp
Object to 4.9 on grounds that: overly simplistic; not borne out by real-life experience;
See attachment