Settlement Hierachy

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 298

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Carey Mackinnon

Representation Summary:

Settlement Hierarchy. Para 4.12
Your definition says that services and features included Medical Facilities and Public Transport but says nothing about their adequacy.
Yes there is an excellent modern Medical Facility but it is already oversubscribed with many times a week being impossible to make an appointment. That's before the existing houses under construction are occupied let alone building any new ones.
Yes there is public transport but at certain times it is quicker to walk from Chichester to Birdham - actual documented event in 2018

Full text:

Settlement Hierarchy. Para 4.12
Your definition says that services and features included Medical Facilities and Public Transport but says nothing about their adequacy.
Yes there is an excellent modern Medical Facility but it is already oversubscribed with many times a week being impossible to make an appointment. That's before the existing houses under construction are occupied let alone building any new ones.
Yes there is public transport but at certain times it is quicker to walk from Chichester to Birdham - actual documented event in 2018

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 1243

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: North Mundham Parish Council

Representation Summary:

It is not clear how may of the 'services and facilities' are required to designate an area as a 'Service Village'

Full text:

It is not clear how may of the 'services and facilities' are required to designate an area as a 'Service Village'

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 1603

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

4.8/4.9
This plan does not enhance or maintain the vitality of some of the rural communities. More development in Fishbourne, Donnington, Chidham, Hambrook and Bosham will damage the communities. Other more rural communities do need more housing to ensure the shops and schools survive. Funtington and East and West Ashling are good examples.

Full text:

4.8/4.9
This plan does not enhance or maintain the vitality of some of the rural communities. More development in Fishbourne, Donnington, Chidham, Hambrook and Bosham will damage the communities. Other more rural communities do need more housing to ensure the shops and schools survive. Funtington and East and West Ashling are good examples.

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 2844

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: MR William Sharp

Representation Summary:

Object to 4.9 on grounds that: overly simplistic; not borne out by real-life experience;

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments: