Policy P13 Registered Parks and Gardens

Showing comments and forms 1 to 5 of 5

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 4296

Received: 15/03/2023

Respondent: The Goodwood Estates Company Limited

Agent: HMPC Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Recognition of the importance of Goodwood House and Park is welcomed, but the value of the Estate to the District (and indeed the National Park) goes well beyond the designated parkland. The Estate is an inter-linked body, where individual elements rely on other parts, activities or events to be sustainable. The Estate is embarked on a long-term strategy to both restore original features and to introduce new, that will continue the evolution of one of the Nation’s significant parklands.

Change suggested by respondent:

This policy is welcomed but we request the supporting paragraphs are revised to reflect the principles set out in the accompanying letter.

Full text:

Recognition of the importance of Goodwood House and Park is welcomed, but the value of the Estate to the District (and indeed the National Park) goes well beyond the designated parkland. The Estate is an inter-linked body, where individual elements rely on other parts, activities or events to be sustainable. The Estate is embarked on a long-term strategy to both restore original features and to introduce new, that will continue the evolution of one of the Nation’s significant parklands.

Attachments:

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5209

Received: 17/03/2023

Respondent: John Newman

Representation Summary:

I agree with Policies P2, P3 (not least point 4), P4 (not least point 2), PS, P6, P7 (though, having had an extension to our house that did project in front of the original building line, as have also my immediate neighbours, I would not want to preclude this possibility where it makes sense and is not deleterious to others), P9, PlO, P11, P13, P14, PlS (the recent case of Lavant comes to mind), and P16 (not least point 3).

Full text:

See attachment.

Attachments:

Object

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 5499

Received: 17/03/2023

Respondent: Bellway Homes (Wessex) Ltd

Agent: Chapman Lily Planning

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation Summary:

Bellway welcome the fact that the policy is tailored to local circumstances but is concerned that the policy won’t be regarded as positively prepared and consistent with the NPPF owing to criteria 4 requiring development to ‘preserve the setting’.

Change suggested by respondent:

Bellway recommend changing criteria 4 to ‘preserve or
enhance’ which acknowledges that some existing features may detract from the setting.

Full text:

See attachment.

Attachments:

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6186

Received: 16/03/2023

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We welcome the inclusion of policies for the historic environment in the local plan at Policies P9 - P13 that, along with other policies, meet the obligation for preparing the positive strategy required by the NPPF. The key test of the soundness of the plan and the achievement of sustainable development as defined in the NPPF in respect of the elements that relate to the historic environment (paragraph 190), in our view, have been met.

Full text:

As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.

There are many issues and matters in the consultation document that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. In our previous comments (by online submissions dated I - 6 February 2019), Historic England focused on the objective of the National Planning Policy Framework to set out a positive strategy for the conservation, enjoyment and enhancement of the historic environment (now Paragraph 190, NPPF); and contain policies to deliver the conservation and enhancement of the historic environment (now Paragraph 190a, NPPF).

Our comments on the Regulation 18 stage draft Local Plan largely have been addressed in the current Publication version or are, in our view, not now likely to affect the soundness of the Local Plan.

We welcome the inclusion of policies for the historic environment in the local plan at Policies P9 - P13 that, along with other policies, meet the obligation for preparing the positive strategy required by the NPPF. The key test of the soundness of the plan and the achievement of sustainable development as defined in the NPPF in respect of the elements that relate to the historic environment (paragraph 190), in our view, have been met.

Attachments:

Support

Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission

Representation ID: 6285

Received: 15/03/2023

Respondent: The Goodwood Estates Company Limited

Agent: HMPC Ltd

Representation Summary:

The policy is welcomed.

Full text:

Recognition of the importance of Goodwood House and Park is welcomed, but the value of the Estate to the District (and indeed the National Park) goes well beyond the designated parkland. The Estate is an inter-linked body, where individual elements rely on other parts, activities or events to be sustainable. The Estate is embarked on a long-term strategy to both restore original features and to introduce new, that will continue the evolution of one of the Nation’s significant parklands.

Attachments: