Policy P10 Listed Buildings
Support
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 4574
Received: 16/03/2023
Respondent: Wisborough Green Parish Council
WGPC supports this policy.
WGPC supports this policy.
Support
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5207
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: John Newman
I agree with Policies P2, P3 (not least point 4), P4 (not least point 2), PS, P6, P7 (though, having had an extension to our house that did project in front of the original building line, as have also my immediate neighbours, I would not want to preclude this possibility where it makes sense and is not deleterious to others), P9, PlO, P11, P13, P14, PlS (the recent case of Lavant comes to mind), and P16 (not least point 3).
See attachment.
Object
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5496
Received: 17/03/2023
Respondent: Bellway Homes (Wessex) Ltd
Agent: Chapman Lily Planning
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Bellway welcome the positive stance to alterations to mitigate climate change and allow for reuse and positive attitude adopted by the Council in relation to Listed Buildings. However, policy merely repeats large tracts of national policy. It is unclear what it adds.
The draft policy could be consolidated into a single heritage policy.
See attachment.
Support
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 5955
Received: 15/03/2023
Respondent: The Chichester Society
Locally listed buildings in Chichester: the Chichester Society offers to work with CDC helping identify Historic Assets including additions to the Local List of suitable buildings. This is undertaken by civic societies in other parts of the country. Information on these schemes can be provided if required.
See attached representation.
Support
Chichester Local Plan 2021 - 2039: Proposed Submission
Representation ID: 6183
Received: 16/03/2023
Respondent: Historic England
We welcome the inclusion of policies for the historic environment in the local plan at Policies P9 - P13 that, along with other policies, meet the obligation for preparing the positive strategy required by the NPPF. The key test of the soundness of the plan and the achievement of sustainable development as defined in the NPPF in respect of the elements that relate to the historic environment (paragraph 190), in our view, have been met.
As the Government's adviser on the historic environment Historic England is keen to ensure that the protection of the historic environment is fully taken into account at all stages of the planning process. This includes formulation of local development policy and plans, supplementary planning documents, area and site proposals, and the on-going review of policies and plans.
There are many issues and matters in the consultation document that are beyond the remit and concern of Historic England and our comments are, as required, limited to matters relating to the historic environment and heritage assets. In our previous comments (by online submissions dated I - 6 February 2019), Historic England focused on the objective of the National Planning Policy Framework to set out a positive strategy for the conservation, enjoyment and enhancement of the historic environment (now Paragraph 190, NPPF); and contain policies to deliver the conservation and enhancement of the historic environment (now Paragraph 190a, NPPF).
Our comments on the Regulation 18 stage draft Local Plan largely have been addressed in the current Publication version or are, in our view, not now likely to affect the soundness of the Local Plan.
We welcome the inclusion of policies for the historic environment in the local plan at Policies P9 - P13 that, along with other policies, meet the obligation for preparing the positive strategy required by the NPPF. The key test of the soundness of the plan and the achievement of sustainable development as defined in the NPPF in respect of the elements that relate to the historic environment (paragraph 190), in our view, have been met.