Appendix C - Appropriate Marketing
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 56
Received: 04/01/2019
Respondent: Mr Stephen Jupp
The final sentence in E.4 is over restrictive as it requires marketing to end, whereas it should be able to continue.
The required discounting of an agricultural property in E.13 is also onerous. The discount is typically in the range of 25 - 33 %. It is NOT at least 30%
The final sentence in E.4 is over restrictive as it requires marketing to end, whereas it should be able to continue.
The required discounting of an agricultural property in E.13 is also onerous. The discount is typically in the range of 25 - 33 %. It is NOT at least 30%
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 73
Received: 08/01/2019
Respondent: Mr Stephen Jupp
Object to E.14 (3) as made clear in Embleton Parish Council v Northumberland CC [2013] there is no requirement in the Framework to show that the business is viable and the Council have not demonstrated unique circumstances in the District to justify a more onerous approach. The requirement on viability should be removed.
Object to E.14 (3) as made clear in Embleton Parish Council v Northumberland CC [2013] there is no requirement in the Framework to show that the business is viable and the Council have not demonstrated unique circumstances in the District to justify a more onerous approach. The requirement on viability should be removed.
Support
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 1478
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: The Theatres Trust
The Trust is supportive of this guidance. To enhance it further we recommend an additional requirement that seeks valuation, particularly for community and cultural facilities, to be based on existing use without development potential.
The Trust is supportive of this guidance. To enhance it further we recommend an additional requirement that seeks valuation, particularly for community and cultural facilities, to be based on existing use without development potential.
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 2613
Received: 05/02/2019
Respondent: Premier Marinas (Chichester) Ltd
Agent: CBRE
Should only apply for CoU from employment-resi, otherwise too onerous/unrealistic.
2 years marketing extensive, unjustified, causes unnecessary financial burden.
See attachment