Development in the Countryside

Showing comments and forms 1 to 4 of 4

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 61

Received: 04/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Stephen Jupp

Representation Summary:

There is no mention of supporting live/work units in appropriate situations in the countryside

Full text:

There is no mention of supporting live/work units in appropriate situations in the countryside

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 707

Received: 01/02/2019

Respondent: Woodmancote Farm Contractors

Agent: Paul Newman Property Consultants Limited

Representation Summary:

Whereas, the general principles relating to the re-use of land in the Countryside is supported, it should be a consideration in the determination of any proposal of existing use values, the need to potentially relocate to more suitable premises and that there will be a requirement for open market housing to support the delivery of these sites.

Full text:

Whereas, the general principles relating to the re-use of land in the Countryside is supported, it should be a consideration in the determination of any proposal of existing use values, the need to potentially relocate to more suitable premises and that there will be a requirement for open market housing to support the delivery of these sites

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 1809

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Harbour Villages Lib Dems Campaign Team

Representation Summary:

7.134 to 7.140 DM22
This plan has no provision for the building of eco communities. There are sites in the rural areas or just outside the SPA (Bosham for example) that could be used to develop high quality eco villages.

Full text:

7.134 to 7.140 DM22
This plan has no provision for the building of eco communities. There are sites in the rural areas or just outside the SPA (Bosham for example) that could be used to develop high quality eco villages.

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 3213

Received: 04/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Sharp

Representation Summary:

In order to reduce the need to travel, it would be harmful to restrict the range of goods sold. If people in rural communities don't have so far to travel to access a range of produce this will reduce Greenhouse gas emissions.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments: