Employment
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 1765
Received: 07/02/2019
Respondent: Mr Dominic Stratton
7.61 Makes no mention of perhaps the best employment site that should be part of this plan which is in the current adopted plan of Westhampnett (for residential) South of Goodwood aerodrome. This site needs to be included as it would serve the North and the hard to reach rural communities that wold currently have to utilise 2 transport modes (bus) to get to the proposed employment sites in the plan.
7.61 Makes no mention of perhaps the best employment site that should be part of this plan which is in the current adopted plan of Westhampnett (for residential) South of Goodwood aerodrome. This site needs to be included as it would serve the North and the hard to reach rural communities that wold currently have to utilise 2 transport modes (bus) to get to the proposed employment sites in the plan.
Object
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 3310
Received: 05/02/2019
Respondent: West Sussex County Council
Agent: Savills Plc
Para 7.54 refers to regularly reviewing existing employment sites. The Tannery site in Westgate has not been assessed. It is not preferred location for offices and it should be released for housing.
See attachment
Comment
Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035
Representation ID: 3547
Received: 06/02/2019
Respondent: Mr John Templeton
Support paragraphs 4.59, 7.57, 7.58, 7.60 and DM9, but propose that these should also apply to the need for affordable housing within the city's urban area and within reach of all facilities by foot and cycle.
Poor quality employment uses should be relocated to locations on the periphery of the city.
See attachment