Employment

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 1765

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Dominic Stratton

Representation Summary:

7.61 Makes no mention of perhaps the best employment site that should be part of this plan which is in the current adopted plan of Westhampnett (for residential) South of Goodwood aerodrome. This site needs to be included as it would serve the North and the hard to reach rural communities that wold currently have to utilise 2 transport modes (bus) to get to the proposed employment sites in the plan.

Full text:

7.61 Makes no mention of perhaps the best employment site that should be part of this plan which is in the current adopted plan of Westhampnett (for residential) South of Goodwood aerodrome. This site needs to be included as it would serve the North and the hard to reach rural communities that wold currently have to utilise 2 transport modes (bus) to get to the proposed employment sites in the plan.

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 3310

Received: 05/02/2019

Respondent: West Sussex County Council

Agent: Savills Plc

Representation Summary:

Para 7.54 refers to regularly reviewing existing employment sites. The Tannery site in Westgate has not been assessed. It is not preferred location for offices and it should be released for housing.

Full text:

See attachment

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 3547

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr John Templeton

Representation Summary:

Support paragraphs 4.59, 7.57, 7.58, 7.60 and DM9, but propose that these should also apply to the need for affordable housing within the city's urban area and within reach of all facilities by foot and cycle.
Poor quality employment uses should be relocated to locations on the periphery of the city.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments: