Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Representation ID: 54

Received: 04/01/2019

Respondent: Mr Stephen Jupp

Representation Summary:

The end of the paragraph after criterion 6 is confusing. If it is the intention of the LPA to include wording on conditions to the effect that occupiers will be "required to live locally in order to perform their role" then i suggest that this does not meet the required tests for a condition as it is vague, imprecise and unenforceable.

The final paragraph / criterion 3 which relates to the removal of agricultural occupancy conditions contradicts what is said in Appendix C in terms of the length of time of the marketing.

Full text:

The end of the paragraph after criterion 6 is confusing. If it is the intention of the LPA to include wording on conditions to the effect that occupiers will be "required to live locally in order to perform their role" then i suggest that this does not meet the required tests for a condition as it is vague, imprecise and unenforceable.

The final paragraph / criterion 3 which relates to the removal of agricultural occupancy conditions contradicts what is said in Appendix C in terms of the length of time of the marketing.