Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Search representations

Results for Junnell Homes Ltd search

New search New search

Support

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S2: Settlement Hierarchy

Representation ID: 3360

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Junnell Homes Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Representation Summary:

We agree that North Mundham is correctly identified as a service village in the hierarchy.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S4: Meeting Housing Needs

Representation ID: 3361

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Junnell Homes Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Representation Summary:

Whilst we understand the need assessment was carried out in accordance with standard method set out in PPG we suggest it has potential flaws as 435dpa in adopted plan already fails to meet need. It should consider the un-met needs of other adjoining authorities not just National Park.

Out of the total 12,350 dwellings, 4,400 or 35% are proposed as new strategic allocations. Given this significant reliance on large sites and potential longer lead in times for housing delivery we suggest the plan includes a trajectory for them especially as this would better comply with Paragraph 73 of the NPPF2.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S5: Parish Housing Requirements 2016-2035

Representation ID: 3363

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Junnell Homes Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Representation Summary:

Promoting site on land east of The Spinney, 0.23ha of land with a capacity of around 8 - 9 dwellings
Unequal distribution of housing.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Policy S24: Countryside

Representation ID: 3365

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Junnell Homes Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Representation Summary:

We object to the way the settlement policy boundary reviews are proposed to take place in the Plan. We prefer an earlier boundary review now for all settlements in the Plan including North Mundham/Runcton. A boundary amendment could increase the supply of windfall sites in an urban area and reduce the requirement for new greenfield allocations in the later DPD or Neighbourhood Plan.
However if boundary reviews of all settlements are not to be made in the Plan we would request policy wording to the last sentence of S24 be amended

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Comment

Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Development Strategy

Representation ID: 3431

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Junnell Homes Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Representation Summary:

Promoting site Land east of The Spinney, Runcton for housing.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.