Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Comment

Representation ID: 2595

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Turley

Attempting to make decision on basis of perceived rather than actual impact is ambiguous and open to subjectivity.

Comment

Representation ID: 2596

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Turley

Wording of para 4 considered prescriptive and inflexible. No reference to 'fabric first principles'

Comment

Representation ID: 2597

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Turley

Final sentence of para 4 of policy is ambiguous and clarification is sought over meaning "requisite infrastructure"

Comment

Representation ID: 2598

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Turley

Whilst our client supports the aspiration to achieve an overall housing mix that is broadly balanced throughout the plan period, it would be helpful if a specified mix were not introduced directly into policy. If included either reflect HEDNA evidence or CDC should produce new evidence to justify varying the mix.

Para 3 ambiguous - focus and requirements of para should be clarified

Encourage CDC to consult on revised Planning Obligations SPD asap.

Requirement to apply nationally described space standards subject to appropriate viability evidence.

Support

Representation ID: 2599

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Turley

Support increased in anticipated capacity.

Amendment to policy wording

Comment

Representation ID: 2600

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Turley

Suggest amendment to paragraph wording 6.92-6.94. Amendments to bullets 1, 5, 7 & 8 of 6.95. See 'Change to Plan'.