Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Support

Representation ID: 3420

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

We agree that
Chidham/Hambrook is correctly identified as a service village in the hierarchy. However the table in the Policy S2 refers to Hambrook/Nutbourne and yet the list of Parish housing sites in policy S5 refers to Chidham & Hambrook parish. Policy AL10 also allocates 500 dwellings to Chidham and Hambrook parish. For consistency, we'd suggest that Chidham and Hambrook parish is used throughout.

Object

Representation ID: 3422

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Promoted site land at Cox's Barn Farm, Broad Road, Hambrook.

We support the principle of having more than one site to meet the strategic allocation of 500 dwellings. Spreading development over 2 or more sites will assist short term housing delivery and minimise the long lead in times that the very large strategic sites are suffering in the current Key Policies Local Plan.

Support

Representation ID: 3423

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

We agree that Bosham is properly classified as a service village in the hierarchy

Object

Representation ID: 3424

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Promoting land at Burnes Shipyard
Refers to windfall small sites allowance. We propose a settlement policy boundary amendment to Bosham to include land at Burnes
Shipyard.

We therefore propose the definition of windfall sites in the Local Plan glossary is clarified to make clear that they comprise previously developed sites that have unexpectedly become available within settlements and in rural areas outside a settlement boundary. This clarification would benefit the Local Plan in better meeting the 'consistent with national policy' test of soundness.

Object

Representation ID: 3425

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

At present the entire 250 housing allocation for Bosham parish is set out in policy AL7 as a strategic allocation to come forward at Highgrove Farm. There is a nil allocation for the parish in policy S5.

We Object as it implies all new housing has to be found on new large strategic sites within the parish and overlooks the potential capacity for unidentified sites to come forward within and adjoining the existing built up area due to modest settlement policy boundary adjustments.
Disagree that any site within the AONB of Bosham should be ruled out for development in principle.

Object

Representation ID: 3426

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

We object to the way the settlement policy boundary reviews are proposed to take place in the Plan.
We prefer an earlier boundary review now for all settlements in the Plan. A boundary amendment now could increase the supply of windfall sites in an urban area and reduce the requirement for new greenfield allocations in the later DPD or Neighbourhood Plan. A boundary amendment now could also secure benefits from redevelopment opportunities of previously developed sites especially where they abut an existing boundary and relate more to a built up area than the surrounding
countryside.

Comment

Representation ID: 3427

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Promoting site at 98 Fishbourne Road for housing.

Comment

Representation ID: 3428

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Promoting site at the former Burnes Shipyard, Bosham for housing.

Comment

Representation ID: 3429

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Seaward Properties Ltd

Agent: Genesis Town Planning

Promoting site at Cox's Barn Farm, Chidham and Hambrook for housing.