Local Plan Review: Preferred Approach 2016-2035

Comment

Representation ID: 2857

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Persimmon Homes

Reconcile requirement of criterion 4 with that of policy DM1. Reword criterion.

Consideration of concentrating efforts on securing accessibility standards for affordable dwellings as opposed to market housing.

Criterion 6 - no transition period for adoption of space standards; nor evidence to justify department from HEDNA requirement to focus on 3/4 bedroom properties.

This policy should be a strategic policy.

Comment

Representation ID: 2862

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Persimmon Homes

Criterion 4 - policy is unnecessary for resi devts - amend policy wording

Criterion 6 - include parking standards as an annex to the plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 2863

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Persimmon Homes

Criterion 1 - no evidence to justify requirement for higher water efficiency

Criterion 6 - should be removed

Support

Representation ID: 2864

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Persimmon Homes

Support wording - approach will ensure that the plan will be able to adapt to changing circumstances

Support

Representation ID: 2865

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Persimmon Homes

Welcome approach but believe there is a missed opportunity in terms of role of lower order settlements - may be pertinent for Council to explore potential of E-W corridor to help meet unmet needs of the wider sub-region.

Object

Representation ID: 2866

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Persimmon Homes

As an unconstrained area, Chichester should seek to meet unmet needs of area or demonstrate that it has considered doing so. SoCGs are required - their omission at this stage means that policy is not effective nor has been positively prepared.